Peer-Reviewed Study - State-of-the-Art Actuarial Science - Excess Deaths in Germany

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
nolaxride
Global Moderator
Posts: 42219
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:09 pm

Re: Peer-Reviewed Study - State-of-the-Art Actuarial Science - Excess Deaths in Germany

Post by nolaxride » Mon May 29, 2023 10:38 pm

IF Covid 19 was bio-engineered, why don't those making the claims publish their proof? They tried in 2020 and it was recently debunked.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119

The paper on potential contamination was interesting but reached no conclusions as to the impact of potential contamination or the ratio of mRNA to DNA. Had you read the paper you'd have noticed that all of the tests were done on expired lots that had been out of temperature control for an extended time. I'm curious why you didn't point that out. I agree with the conclusion, more study is needed.

Dr. Martin? Do you mean David Martin, the finance guy who is a noted denier? Sorry.
0 x
-- 滑板車是個文盲

User avatar
clusterchuck
Caporegime
Posts: 15037
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:19 pm

Re: Peer-Reviewed Study - State-of-the-Art Actuarial Science - Excess Deaths in Germany

Post by clusterchuck » Tue May 30, 2023 6:12 pm

Over 300 COVID-19 Papers Withdrawn for Not Meeting Standards of Scientific Soundness
WORLD
Jessie Zhang May 26 2023

Research journals have withdrawn well over 300 articles on COVID-19 due to compromised ethical standards and concerns about the publications’ scientific validity.

Retraction Watch has provided a running list of withdrawn papers on COVID-19 ranging from “Acute kidney injury associated with COVID-19” to “Can Your AI Differentiate Cats from COVID-19?”

A total of 330 research papers have currently been retracted.

During the pandemic, researchers have compromised on ethical standards and tried to either get more publications approved or to take shortcuts around ethics, senior researcher Gunnveig Grødeland at the Institute of Immunology at the University of Oslo says, after going through the list of articles that have been withdrawn, and the reasons for some of them.

While it is quite natural for some articles to be updated or changed to be published in a different form, some have been retracted because the researchers did not obtain informed consent during the research.

“It will, of course, be withdrawn when it is found that ethical guidelines have been breached,” Grødeland told Khrono, a Norwegian higher education and research newspaper.

She pointed out that other articles have been withdrawn after the editors noticed that the strategies the papers mentioned were giving the wrong impression in the media of being recommended as actual treatment or prevention of COVID-19.

She said these sorts of articles had to be withdrawn as they claimed things that neither the authors of the articles nor their institutions could vouch for.

In addition, some studies did not include a large enough sample size.

When more subjects were included, the researchers could no longer maintain the same conclusions they made earlier about the effect of the drugs.

“A Little Out of Hand”
Grødeland said that part of the reason this happened during the pandemic was that relatively more people suddenly started conducting research on a topic they really knew relatively little about.

Even prestigious journals such as the Lancet were publishing those articles.

One of Lancet’s studies even caused both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the national government to stop the comprehensive testing of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness against COVID-19.

The extensive Lancet study, allegedly based on research fraud, said that the drug increased the risk of heart arrhythmia and mortality for COVID-19 patients.

Retracted.jpg

A screenshot taken Dec 24, 2020, of thelancet.com, shows the retracted study that prompted some countries to ban the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19. (Screenshot/TheLancet.com/Epoch Times)
However, most of the retracted papers were published in smaller journals, the vaccine researcher points out.

“When you look at the articles that have been retracted, the vast majority were published in the less interesting journals. It is they who are mainly affected by withdrawals,” Grødeland said.

But there were a number of environments that do not normally carry out research, which suddenly started producing research after receiving funding from local hospitals.

“It may have caused things to get a little out of hand in some places,” she said.

Hearing Loss?
A recent case from the University of Manchester backtracked on an earlier study that said that COVID-19 was associated with hearing loss, tinnitus (ringing in the ears), and vertigo.

Published in 2021, the researchers said they had identified about 60 studies that report audio-vestibular problems in people with confirmed COVID-19.

“Our analysis of the pooled data, published in the International Journal of Audiology, reveals that seven to 15 percent of adults diagnosed with COVID-19 report audio-vestibular symptoms,” audiology professor at the University of Manchester Kevin Munro said.

“The most common symptom is tinnitus followed by hearing difficulties and vertigo.”

Two years later, after the virus has been blamed for a range of health problems, including auditory disorders, the same university published a new study concluding that hearing loss is unlikely to be caused by COVID-19.

Hearing loss is unlikely to be caused by COVID-19, scientists now conclude. (Ground Picture/Shutterstock)
Lead author and audiologist Anisa Visram explained their reasoning.

“We know that viruses such as measles, mumps, and meningitis can damage the auditory system,” Visram said in a release.

“It is also well known that COVID-19 can affect our sense of smell and taste, so it was reasonable to assume it might also affect our sense of hearing.”

Visram assured that their current study is well designed and executed and is the most thorough assessment of hearing conducted in people with COVID-19.

Munro also acknowledged that their earlier work may have been rushed.

“There was an urgent need for this carefully conducted clinical and diagnostic study to investigate the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the auditory system,” he said.

“Many previous studies were published rapidly during the pandemic but lacked good scientific rigour.”

“It hasn’t been clear if these are incidental findings or if COVID-19 is damaging the hearing system,” Professor Richard Ramsden, Trustee at the Dowager Countess Eleanor Peel Trust, added.

“While the study cannot rule out infrequent hearing loss as a result of COVID-19, we now know that for most people, there is nothing to be concerned about.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/over-300- ... 93140.html
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
0 x
Those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music.
Law of War. Military Occupancy. COG is in effect. 13848 13961

User avatar
nolaxride
Global Moderator
Posts: 42219
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:09 pm

Re: Peer-Reviewed Study - State-of-the-Art Actuarial Science - Excess Deaths in Germany

Post by nolaxride » Wed May 31, 2023 8:12 am

An interesting list. Lots of research that probably shouldn't have been done.

There were a couple of jewels in that list, however. For example, "A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products" was retracted. I'm surprised the denier crowd didn't latch onto this one, "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis,” published in March-August 2020 issue of Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs."

Then there was the normal ivermectin scam. “Effects of a Single Dose of Ivermectin on Viral and Clinical Outcomes in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infected Subjects: A Pilot Clinical Trial in Lebanon,” published on May 26, 2021 in Viruses, and "“Efficacy and Safety of Ivermectin for Treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 Pandemic," and "“Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis & Treatment of COVID-19,” published as an abstract at Frontiers in Pharmacology in January 2021, removed without a notice by March 1, 2021" were all quoted by the deniers, after they'd been withdrawn.

Similarly, using hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid was touted by many. “Safety and efficacy of favipiravir versus hydroxychloroquine in management of COVID-19: A randomised controlled trial,” published on March 31, 2021 in Scientific Reports; retracted on September 18, 2021, “SARS-CoV-2 was Unexpectedly Deadlier than Push-scooters: Could Hydroxychloroquine be the Unique Solution?” published on August 15, 2020 in Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, retracted August 16, 2020, and “Treatment Response to Hydroxychloroquine, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, and Antibiotics for Moderate COVID 19: A First Report on the Pharmacological Outcomes from South Korea” preprint posted May 18, 2020 in medRxiv, and withdrawn June 14, 2020, were similarly quoted by deniers after they were withdrawn.

The paper I linked to on the furin cleave site has not been withdrawn and proves that the virus was not genetically engineered; no gain of function.
1 x
-- 滑板車是個文盲

User avatar
Chester Cheesewright
Underboss
Posts: 33887
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:09 am

Re: Peer-Reviewed Study - State-of-the-Art Actuarial Science - Excess Deaths in Germany

Post by Chester Cheesewright » Wed May 31, 2023 8:54 am

clusterchuck wrote:
Mon May 29, 2023 6:30 pm
Key points raised during the Summit:

► Coronavirus gain-of-function began in the 60s.

► $10,000,000,000 of your money was "invested" in NIAD/Fauci programs, matching DOD bio defense budgets, dollar for dollar.

► 2002, NIAD/Fauci file biological weapons patent for SARS.

► 2003, CDC filed the patent on coronavirus isolated from humans with a sequence from China.

► 2005, SARS labeled "bioweapons platform technology."

► 2005, SARS is classified as "biological warfare enabling technology."

► 2014, University of NC Chapel Hill exempted from gain-of-function moratorium by NIAD/Fauci.

► 2016, National Academy of Sciences announced, "SARS coronavirus WIV1 poised for human emergence."
WIV1 stands for, Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1.

► April 2019, 4x stated, "There is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen." Key word "release".

► 766M infected worldwide.

► 7M deaths (excluding VAERS).

► Covid-19 was an act of biological warfare perpetrated on the human race. It was a financial heist. Nature was hijacked. Science was hijacked. Free speech was oppressed and dissenting voices were persecuted.

For your reference:

13 minute review of Summit 3 w/intro commentary by Dr. John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuZ7-J7d0jk
You'll note Dr. Campbell cuts off the last Parliament member closing statement because his comments are "risky" on youtube. Unfortunately, censorship imposed over the last several years remains in place on many big tech platforms.

Youtube videos: for whatever reason, cameras used in these recordings remained on the speakers, so there are no accompanying slides.
3rd Summit Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFLPWWCAHfQ
3rd Summit Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ93mW_sMPo

Dr. David Martin 21 minute presentation: https://mega.nz/file/gaQB0SoJ#jAtPhDFOD ... ijNmur7VCI (No Slides)

This 8 hour 39 minute recording includes slides & supporting data presented to the live audience. Dr. Martin presentation begins around the 13 minute mark:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org ... nce-may-4/

The International Covid Summit site: https://www.internationalcovidsummit.com/
► Well, here's one of your accusations, albeit articulad somewhat differently:
Dr Fauci oversaw an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose, and treat established infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, tuberculosis, and malaria as well as emerging diseases such as Ebola, Zika and COVID-19.
It's clowns like you and Jesse Waters who have endangered the lives of Dr Fauci and his family
0 x
► Watching fat cats get taxed touches the very depths of a Republican’s soul

User avatar
Chester Cheesewright
Underboss
Posts: 33887
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 1:09 am

Re: Peer-Reviewed Study - State-of-the-Art Actuarial Science - Excess Deaths in Germany

Post by Chester Cheesewright » Wed May 31, 2023 8:54 am

clusterchuck wrote:
Mon May 29, 2023 6:30 pm
Key points raised during the Summit:

► Coronavirus gain-of-function began in the 60s.

► $10,000,000,000 of your money was "invested" in NIAD/Fauci programs, matching DOD bio defense budgets, dollar for dollar.

► 2002, NIAD/Fauci file biological weapons patent for SARS.

► 2003, CDC filed the patent on coronavirus isolated from humans with a sequence from China.

► 2005, SARS labeled "bioweapons platform technology."

► 2005, SARS is classified as "biological warfare enabling technology."

► 2014, University of NC Chapel Hill exempted from gain-of-function moratorium by NIAD/Fauci.

► 2016, National Academy of Sciences announced, "SARS coronavirus WIV1 poised for human emergence."
WIV1 stands for, Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1.

► April 2019, 4x stated, "There is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen." Key word "release".

► 766M infected worldwide.

► 7M deaths (excluding VAERS).

► Covid-19 was an act of biological warfare perpetrated on the human race. It was a financial heist. Nature was hijacked. Science was hijacked. Free speech was oppressed and dissenting voices were persecuted.

For your reference:

13 minute review of Summit 3 w/intro commentary by Dr. John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuZ7-J7d0jk
You'll note Dr. Campbell cuts off the last Parliament member closing statement because his comments are "risky" on youtube. Unfortunately, censorship imposed over the last several years remains in place on many big tech platforms.

Youtube videos: for whatever reason, cameras used in these recordings remained on the speakers, so there are no accompanying slides.
3rd Summit Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFLPWWCAHfQ
3rd Summit Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ93mW_sMPo

Dr. David Martin 21 minute presentation: https://mega.nz/file/gaQB0SoJ#jAtPhDFOD ... ijNmur7VCI (No Slides)

This 8 hour 39 minute recording includes slides & supporting data presented to the live audience. Dr. Martin presentation begins around the 13 minute mark:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org ... nce-may-4/

The International Covid Summit site: https://www.internationalcovidsummit.com/





► Well, here's one of your accusations, albeit articulated somewhat differently:
Dr Fauci oversaw an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose, and treat established infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, tuberculosis, and malaria as well as emerging diseases such as Ebola, Zika and COVID-19.
It's clowns like you and Jesse Waters who have endangered the lives of Dr Fauci and his family, not to mention the health and well being of the general public

And why? Because Trump

Because there's no other possible reason. With your background and tech savvy you could easily debunk yourself.

But why bother with that when you're having so much fun on the Internet?
1 x
► Watching fat cats get taxed touches the very depths of a Republican’s soul

Post Reply