Yeah Karl but don't people still have to design, build and maintain the robots?

Computers, electronics, gadgets....
User avatar
Pete
Site Admin
Posts: 7370
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:15 am
Location: Atlanta GA USA

Re: Yeah Karl but don't people still have to design, build and maintain the robots?

Post by Pete » Tue May 08, 2018 1:36 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:32 pm
Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:31 pm
nolaxride wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:24 pm
Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 12:51 pm
nolaxride wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 12:42 am
Pete wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 6:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 2:24 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 2:22 pm
One hundred and sixty years ago, at a time when the light bulb was not yet invented, Karl Marx predicted that robots would replace humans in the workplace.

“[O]nce adopted into the production process of capital, the means of labor passes through different metamorphoses, whose culmination is the machine, or rather, an automatic system of machinery,” he wrote in his then-unpublished manuscript Fundamentals of Political Economy Criticism. “The workers themselves are cast merely as its conscious linkages.”







https://qz.com/1269525/capitalism-is-un ... predicted/
Until AI advances to the point they can design, build, and maintain themselves.
We can't even get a robot car to stay on the road
We can. We can't seem to get homeless people from jumping in front of self-driving cars.
don't the cars have brakes?
Of course, they do. 6,000 pedestrians were killed by cars with brakes last year.
Yeah but AFAIK robots dont text, put on makep, take selfies, drink alcohol etc while driving
Good!
Robot cars 1
People cars 0

:lo2l:
robot cars dont do any of that and they still hit people. what's their excuse? :nesaitpas:
0 x
I like to leave a message before the beep

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 35578
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: Yeah Karl but don't people still have to design, build and maintain the robots?

Post by evilconempire » Tue May 08, 2018 1:37 pm

Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:36 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:32 pm
Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:31 pm
nolaxride wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:24 pm
Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 12:51 pm
nolaxride wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 12:42 am
Pete wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 6:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 2:24 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 2:22 pm
One hundred and sixty years ago, at a time when the light bulb was not yet invented, Karl Marx predicted that robots would replace humans in the workplace.

“[O]nce adopted into the production process of capital, the means of labor passes through different metamorphoses, whose culmination is the machine, or rather, an automatic system of machinery,” he wrote in his then-unpublished manuscript Fundamentals of Political Economy Criticism. “The workers themselves are cast merely as its conscious linkages.”







https://qz.com/1269525/capitalism-is-un ... predicted/
Until AI advances to the point they can design, build, and maintain themselves.
We can't even get a robot car to stay on the road
We can. We can't seem to get homeless people from jumping in front of self-driving cars.
don't the cars have brakes?
Of course, they do. 6,000 pedestrians were killed by cars with brakes last year.
Yeah but AFAIK robots dont text, put on makep, take selfies, drink alcohol etc while driving
Good!
Robot cars 1
People cars 0

:lo2l:
robot cars dont do any of that and they still hit people. what's their excuse? :nesaitpas:
People
0 x
"I find nothing in you that is worthwhile and hope the next guy with a gun that wants to shoot up a school runs into you." :prech:

User avatar
Pete
Site Admin
Posts: 7370
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:15 am
Location: Atlanta GA USA

Re: Yeah Karl but don't people still have to design, build and maintain the robots?

Post by Pete » Tue May 08, 2018 1:40 pm

did the robots tell you that or did you make it up?

:guffaw:
0 x
I like to leave a message before the beep

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 35578
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: Yeah Karl but don't people still have to design, build and maintain the robots?

Post by evilconempire » Tue May 08, 2018 1:42 pm

The robots told me to say it.

Image
0 x
"I find nothing in you that is worthwhile and hope the next guy with a gun that wants to shoot up a school runs into you." :prech:

User avatar
nolaxride
Global Moderator
Posts: 17954
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:09 pm

Re: Yeah Karl but don't people still have to design, build and maintain the robots?

Post by nolaxride » Tue May 08, 2018 2:06 pm

Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:31 pm
nolaxride wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 1:24 pm
Pete wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 12:51 pm
nolaxride wrote:
Tue May 08, 2018 12:42 am
Pete wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 6:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 2:24 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon May 07, 2018 2:22 pm
One hundred and sixty years ago, at a time when the light bulb was not yet invented, Karl Marx predicted that robots would replace humans in the workplace.

“[O]nce adopted into the production process of capital, the means of labor passes through different metamorphoses, whose culmination is the machine, or rather, an automatic system of machinery,” he wrote in his then-unpublished manuscript Fundamentals of Political Economy Criticism. “The workers themselves are cast merely as its conscious linkages.”







https://qz.com/1269525/capitalism-is-un ... predicted/
Until AI advances to the point they can design, build, and maintain themselves.
We can't even get a robot car to stay on the road
We can. We can't seem to get homeless people from jumping in front of self-driving cars.
don't the cars have brakes?
Of course, they do. 6,000 pedestrians were killed by cars with brakes last year.
Yeah but AFAIK robots dont text, put on makep, take selfies, drink alcohol etc while driving
Correct. They do, however, need to be calibrated, and in the case of this Uber, it was poorly calibrated. The software saw the pedestrian and the threshold was set to low that it didn't act.

Poor QA.
0 x
-- Ignotum per inotius

Post Reply