do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33112
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by evilconempire » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:02 pm

chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:57 am
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:55 am
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?
It might have been on a prior board or he could have used a synonym of "emboldened"
Of course. You must not remember it well if you don't know whether of not it was even on this board or if he used the word "emboldened."
I definitely remember him making that point more than once in the last few years . I don't remember when or his exact words. :)2
It's a safe guess anyway since he had been down on every aspect of the Obama presidency.
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 13643
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by I am Z » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:03 pm

chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:01 pm
I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:00 pm
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:57 am
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:55 am
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?
It might have been on a prior board or he could have used a synonym of "emboldened"
Of course. You must not remember it well if you don't know whether of not it was even on this board or if he used the word "emboldened."
I definitely remember him making that point more than once in the last few years . I don't remember when or his exact words. :)2
I'm not the subject of the thread topic, although he would prefer it since he can't defend his previous idol...oblasphemer.

:d:
He isn't easy to defend on many issues.

it's too bad that he turned out to be very weak and feckless during both his terms in office.

initially, I kind of liked the guy and definitely gave him a year before I realized what he really was.
0 x
gender appropriation is ok if you're a liberal

:flycarpet:

User avatar
barrysoetoro
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 30346
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:55 pm

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by barrysoetoro » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?

Barack Obama has emboldened America's enemies

The departure of Chuck Hagel as Defence Secretary reflects the administration's failure to confront its enemies

By Telegraph View6:25AM GMT 25 Nov 2014CommentsComment
The resignation yesterday of Chuck Hagel, the US Defence Secretary, will inevitably raise questions about the effectiveness of President Obama’s approach to dealing with a worrying array of national security concerns. Coming on the same day as the collapse of talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear programme, the departure of the Obama administration’s only remaining Republican official – reportedly after arguments over how best to deal with Islamic State (Isil) – suggests the White House is struggling to come up with a credible strategy for confronting and containing America’s enemies overseas.

Despite the tributes Mr Obama paid to his outgoing secretary, praising the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran for his “class and integrity”, no one in Washington was under any illusion that Mr Hagel had left of his own free will. The irony of his dismissal is that, having initially been given the job because he shared Mr Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, Mr Hagel had become a staunch advocate of decisive military action to curb the mounting threat posed by Isil militants in Iraq and Syria.
His view that Isil, as he remarked in August, represented an “imminent threat to every interest we have” in the Middle East put him at odds with the Obama administration’s deep-seated aversion to becoming embroiled in messy, overseas conflicts. Having incurred the ire of the White House, it was simply a question of time before the third defence secretary of Mr Obama’s presidency was required to fall on his sword.
But as the White House begins its search for a suitable replacement, the evidence suggests that the president’s non-confrontational stance is storing up some serious problems. Western diplomats yesterday sought to put a brave face on their failure to resolve the 12-year dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, agreeing to extend the talks for a further seven months. But critics blame Mr Obama for the deadlock, arguing he made too many concessions to Iran too early in the process to be able to force Tehran to make the necessary concessions. As a result, the ayatollahs, as they have done so often in the past, simply strung the negotiating process along, while continuing with their uranium enrichment activities.


Understand, 0bamapologisto?
0 x
☪ "May God d*mn the Saudis and America.", brookboy123 (nobrain & dope are fine with this )

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33112
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by evilconempire » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:05 pm

I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:00 pm
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:57 am
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:55 am
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?
It might have been on a prior board or he could have used a synonym of "emboldened"
Of course. You must not remember it well if you don't know whether of not it was even on this board or if he used the word "emboldened."
I definitely remember him making that point more than once in the last few years . I don't remember when or his exact words. :)2
I'm not the subject of the thread topic, although he would prefer it since he can't defend his previous idol...oblasphemer.

:d:
do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?
Except that you made yourself the subject with the thread title. lol
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33112
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by evilconempire » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:06 pm

barrysoetoro wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?

Barack Obama has emboldened America's enemies

The departure of Chuck Hagel as Defence Secretary reflects the administration's failure to confront its enemies

By Telegraph View6:25AM GMT 25 Nov 2014CommentsComment
The resignation yesterday of Chuck Hagel, the US Defence Secretary, will inevitably raise questions about the effectiveness of President Obama’s approach to dealing with a worrying array of national security concerns. Coming on the same day as the collapse of talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear programme, the departure of the Obama administration’s only remaining Republican official – reportedly after arguments over how best to deal with Islamic State (Isil) – suggests the White House is struggling to come up with a credible strategy for confronting and containing America’s enemies overseas.

Despite the tributes Mr Obama paid to his outgoing secretary, praising the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran for his “class and integrity”, no one in Washington was under any illusion that Mr Hagel had left of his own free will. The irony of his dismissal is that, having initially been given the job because he shared Mr Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, Mr Hagel had become a staunch advocate of decisive military action to curb the mounting threat posed by Isil militants in Iraq and Syria.
His view that Isil, as he remarked in August, represented an “imminent threat to every interest we have” in the Middle East put him at odds with the Obama administration’s deep-seated aversion to becoming embroiled in messy, overseas conflicts. Having incurred the ire of the White House, it was simply a question of time before the third defence secretary of Mr Obama’s presidency was required to fall on his sword.
But as the White House begins its search for a suitable replacement, the evidence suggests that the president’s non-confrontational stance is storing up some serious problems. Western diplomats yesterday sought to put a brave face on their failure to resolve the 12-year dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, agreeing to extend the talks for a further seven months. But critics blame Mr Obama for the deadlock, arguing he made too many concessions to Iran too early in the process to be able to force Tehran to make the necessary concessions. As a result, the ayatollahs, as they have done so often in the past, simply strung the negotiating process along, while continuing with their uranium enrichment activities.


Understand, 0bamapologisto?
You're saying Z wrote that?
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by chucky » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:07 pm

I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:03 pm
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:01 pm
I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:00 pm
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:57 am
chucky wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:55 am
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?
It might have been on a prior board or he could have used a synonym of "emboldened"
Of course. You must not remember it well if you don't know whether of not it was even on this board or if he used the word "emboldened."
I definitely remember him making that point more than once in the last few years . I don't remember when or his exact words. :)2
I'm not the subject of the thread topic, although he would prefer it since he can't defend his previous idol...oblasphemer.

:d:
He isn't easy to defend on many issues.

it's too bad that he turned out to be very weak and feckless during both his terms in office.

initially, I kind of liked the guy and definitely gave him a year before I realized what he really was.
He was pretty liberal in the senate so we got what I expected. It would have been different if the Dems had maintained control of congress for his whole presidency. Luckily he was stymied a lot in his last 4 years.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 13643
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by I am Z » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:32 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:06 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?

Barack Obama has emboldened America's enemies

The departure of Chuck Hagel as Defence Secretary reflects the administration's failure to confront its enemies

By Telegraph View6:25AM GMT 25 Nov 2014CommentsComment
The resignation yesterday of Chuck Hagel, the US Defence Secretary, will inevitably raise questions about the effectiveness of President Obama’s approach to dealing with a worrying array of national security concerns. Coming on the same day as the collapse of talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear programme, the departure of the Obama administration’s only remaining Republican official – reportedly after arguments over how best to deal with Islamic State (Isil) – suggests the White House is struggling to come up with a credible strategy for confronting and containing America’s enemies overseas.

Despite the tributes Mr Obama paid to his outgoing secretary, praising the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran for his “class and integrity”, no one in Washington was under any illusion that Mr Hagel had left of his own free will. The irony of his dismissal is that, having initially been given the job because he shared Mr Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, Mr Hagel had become a staunch advocate of decisive military action to curb the mounting threat posed by Isil militants in Iraq and Syria.
His view that Isil, as he remarked in August, represented an “imminent threat to every interest we have” in the Middle East put him at odds with the Obama administration’s deep-seated aversion to becoming embroiled in messy, overseas conflicts. Having incurred the ire of the White House, it was simply a question of time before the third defence secretary of Mr Obama’s presidency was required to fall on his sword.
But as the White House begins its search for a suitable replacement, the evidence suggests that the president’s non-confrontational stance is storing up some serious problems. Western diplomats yesterday sought to put a brave face on their failure to resolve the 12-year dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, agreeing to extend the talks for a further seven months. But critics blame Mr Obama for the deadlock, arguing he made too many concessions to Iran too early in the process to be able to force Tehran to make the necessary concessions. As a result, the ayatollahs, as they have done so often in the past, simply strung the negotiating process along, while continuing with their uranium enrichment activities.


Understand, 0bamapologisto?
You're saying Z wrote that?

asking someone if they remember a SUBJECT that I talked about doesn't make me the subject, dummy.


and that subject was.....Obama's weak foreign policy........


you're welcome.

now then, if you wish to talk about the SUBJECT, by all means do so.

:machine-gun:
0 x
gender appropriation is ok if you're a liberal

:flycarpet:

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33112
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by evilconempire » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:02 pm

I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:32 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:06 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?

Barack Obama has emboldened America's enemies

The departure of Chuck Hagel as Defence Secretary reflects the administration's failure to confront its enemies

By Telegraph View6:25AM GMT 25 Nov 2014CommentsComment
The resignation yesterday of Chuck Hagel, the US Defence Secretary, will inevitably raise questions about the effectiveness of President Obama’s approach to dealing with a worrying array of national security concerns. Coming on the same day as the collapse of talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear programme, the departure of the Obama administration’s only remaining Republican official – reportedly after arguments over how best to deal with Islamic State (Isil) – suggests the White House is struggling to come up with a credible strategy for confronting and containing America’s enemies overseas.

Despite the tributes Mr Obama paid to his outgoing secretary, praising the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran for his “class and integrity”, no one in Washington was under any illusion that Mr Hagel had left of his own free will. The irony of his dismissal is that, having initially been given the job because he shared Mr Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, Mr Hagel had become a staunch advocate of decisive military action to curb the mounting threat posed by Isil militants in Iraq and Syria.
His view that Isil, as he remarked in August, represented an “imminent threat to every interest we have” in the Middle East put him at odds with the Obama administration’s deep-seated aversion to becoming embroiled in messy, overseas conflicts. Having incurred the ire of the White House, it was simply a question of time before the third defence secretary of Mr Obama’s presidency was required to fall on his sword.
But as the White House begins its search for a suitable replacement, the evidence suggests that the president’s non-confrontational stance is storing up some serious problems. Western diplomats yesterday sought to put a brave face on their failure to resolve the 12-year dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, agreeing to extend the talks for a further seven months. But critics blame Mr Obama for the deadlock, arguing he made too many concessions to Iran too early in the process to be able to force Tehran to make the necessary concessions. As a result, the ayatollahs, as they have done so often in the past, simply strung the negotiating process along, while continuing with their uranium enrichment activities.


Understand, 0bamapologisto?
You're saying Z wrote that?

asking someone if they remember a SUBJECT that I talked about doesn't make me the subject, dummy.


and that subject was.....Obama's weak foreign policy........


you're welcome.

now then, if you wish to talk about the SUBJECT, by all means do so.

:machine-gun:
Lol you asked so I answered. Now you're whining about what is or isn't the topic. Hilarious!
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 13643
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by I am Z » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:33 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:02 pm
I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:32 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:06 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?

Barack Obama has emboldened America's enemies

The departure of Chuck Hagel as Defence Secretary reflects the administration's failure to confront its enemies

By Telegraph View6:25AM GMT 25 Nov 2014CommentsComment
The resignation yesterday of Chuck Hagel, the US Defence Secretary, will inevitably raise questions about the effectiveness of President Obama’s approach to dealing with a worrying array of national security concerns. Coming on the same day as the collapse of talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear programme, the departure of the Obama administration’s only remaining Republican official – reportedly after arguments over how best to deal with Islamic State (Isil) – suggests the White House is struggling to come up with a credible strategy for confronting and containing America’s enemies overseas.

Despite the tributes Mr Obama paid to his outgoing secretary, praising the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran for his “class and integrity”, no one in Washington was under any illusion that Mr Hagel had left of his own free will. The irony of his dismissal is that, having initially been given the job because he shared Mr Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, Mr Hagel had become a staunch advocate of decisive military action to curb the mounting threat posed by Isil militants in Iraq and Syria.
His view that Isil, as he remarked in August, represented an “imminent threat to every interest we have” in the Middle East put him at odds with the Obama administration’s deep-seated aversion to becoming embroiled in messy, overseas conflicts. Having incurred the ire of the White House, it was simply a question of time before the third defence secretary of Mr Obama’s presidency was required to fall on his sword.
But as the White House begins its search for a suitable replacement, the evidence suggests that the president’s non-confrontational stance is storing up some serious problems. Western diplomats yesterday sought to put a brave face on their failure to resolve the 12-year dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, agreeing to extend the talks for a further seven months. But critics blame Mr Obama for the deadlock, arguing he made too many concessions to Iran too early in the process to be able to force Tehran to make the necessary concessions. As a result, the ayatollahs, as they have done so often in the past, simply strung the negotiating process along, while continuing with their uranium enrichment activities.


Understand, 0bamapologisto?
You're saying Z wrote that?

asking someone if they remember a SUBJECT that I talked about doesn't make me the subject, dummy.


and that subject was.....Obama's weak foreign policy........


you're welcome.

now then, if you wish to talk about the SUBJECT, by all means do so.

:machine-gun:
Lol you asked so I answered. Now you're whining about what is or isn't the topic. Hilarious!

I asked a question and you immediately started to complain:


I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?


you never bothered to address the subject of the thread topic which again, is barackhusseinobama's weak foreign policy.

it looks like you never will.

thanks for playing.

Johnny????? tell our ex contestant what lovely parting gifts are hers!
0 x
gender appropriation is ok if you're a liberal

:flycarpet:

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33112
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: do you remember when i was saying that obama's foreign policy emboldened our enemies?

Post by evilconempire » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:49 pm

I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:33 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:02 pm
I am Z wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:32 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:06 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:52 am
I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?

Barack Obama has emboldened America's enemies

The departure of Chuck Hagel as Defence Secretary reflects the administration's failure to confront its enemies

By Telegraph View6:25AM GMT 25 Nov 2014CommentsComment
The resignation yesterday of Chuck Hagel, the US Defence Secretary, will inevitably raise questions about the effectiveness of President Obama’s approach to dealing with a worrying array of national security concerns. Coming on the same day as the collapse of talks in Vienna on Iran’s nuclear programme, the departure of the Obama administration’s only remaining Republican official – reportedly after arguments over how best to deal with Islamic State (Isil) – suggests the White House is struggling to come up with a credible strategy for confronting and containing America’s enemies overseas.

Despite the tributes Mr Obama paid to his outgoing secretary, praising the 68-year-old Vietnam veteran for his “class and integrity”, no one in Washington was under any illusion that Mr Hagel had left of his own free will. The irony of his dismissal is that, having initially been given the job because he shared Mr Obama’s opposition to the Iraq war, Mr Hagel had become a staunch advocate of decisive military action to curb the mounting threat posed by Isil militants in Iraq and Syria.
His view that Isil, as he remarked in August, represented an “imminent threat to every interest we have” in the Middle East put him at odds with the Obama administration’s deep-seated aversion to becoming embroiled in messy, overseas conflicts. Having incurred the ire of the White House, it was simply a question of time before the third defence secretary of Mr Obama’s presidency was required to fall on his sword.
But as the White House begins its search for a suitable replacement, the evidence suggests that the president’s non-confrontational stance is storing up some serious problems. Western diplomats yesterday sought to put a brave face on their failure to resolve the 12-year dispute over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, agreeing to extend the talks for a further seven months. But critics blame Mr Obama for the deadlock, arguing he made too many concessions to Iran too early in the process to be able to force Tehran to make the necessary concessions. As a result, the ayatollahs, as they have done so often in the past, simply strung the negotiating process along, while continuing with their uranium enrichment activities.


Understand, 0bamapologisto?
You're saying Z wrote that?

asking someone if they remember a SUBJECT that I talked about doesn't make me the subject, dummy.


and that subject was.....Obama's weak foreign policy........


you're welcome.

now then, if you wish to talk about the SUBJECT, by all means do so.

:machine-gun:
Lol you asked so I answered. Now you're whining about what is or isn't the topic. Hilarious!

I asked a question and you immediately started to complain:


I don't and a search of your posts for "emboldened" returns one result...this thread. Do you have proof you said this?


you never bothered to address the subject of the thread topic which again, is barackhusseinobama's weak foreign policy.

it looks like you never will.

thanks for playing.

Johnny????? tell our ex contestant what lovely parting gifts are hers!
No, I did. See where I said "I don't "? I was saying I don't remember you saying that. That's what you asked.

By the way, I'm still waiting for proof that you did.
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

Post Reply