America Is Becoming A Fascist State

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

brookboy123 wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

evilconempire wrote:I see the usual freeloaders and their excuses have arrived.

I've never been on SSDI, leech.

snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

The invitation stands, coward.

Just donated 10 bucks. It's really that easy to help Pete keep the board running.

you guys are way too generous, but thanks. If/when we get anywhere near $100 we'll shut the tip jar down until Jan 1. This is not supposed to be a money-making operation. I honestly never cared if I got a dime, really. It's a cheap hobby for me

Heck, it's only 10 bucks. :-D

clusterchuck wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

brookboy123 wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

evilconempire wrote:I see the usual freeloaders and their excuses have arrived.

I've never been on SSDI, leech.

snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

DallasDimeBags wrote:

clusterchuck wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

brookboy123 wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

evilconempire wrote:I see the usual freeloaders and their excuses have arrived.

I've never been on SSDI, leech.

snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

evilconempire wrote:

DallasDimeBags wrote:

clusterchuck wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

brookboy123 wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

evilconempire wrote:I see the usual freeloaders and their excuses have arrived.

I've never been on SSDI, leech.

snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

He did not address the comment to you nor was it in any way an insult or slight to you. It was an (alleged anyway) expressed concern about anonymity. You chose to take a cheap shot. Perhaps because sniffy has done the same to you. So why are you really any different than him if that is the case.

DallasDimeBags wrote:

evilconempire wrote:

DallasDimeBags wrote:

clusterchuck wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

brookboy123 wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

evilconempire wrote:I see the usual freeloaders and their excuses have arrived.

I've never been on SSDI, leech.

snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

He did not address the comment to you nor was it in any way an insult or slight to you. It was an (alleged anyway) expressed concern about anonymity. You chose to take a cheap shot. Perhaps because sniffy has done the same to you. So why are you really any different than him if that is the case.

So he shouldn't be treated the same way he treats me and others? I'll have to disagree with that. He reaps what he sows.

evilconempire wrote:

DallasDimeBags wrote:

evilconempire wrote:

DallasDimeBags wrote:

clusterchuck wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

brookboy123 wrote:

Lord_Snuffington wrote:

evilconempire wrote:I see the usual freeloaders and their excuses have arrived.

I've never been on SSDI, leech.

snuffy.....annie doesn't want any of the behavior that got the other boards closed.

Please try to behave.

Then tell your leech buddy to shut his yap before I shut it for him.

I donated and didn't give anonymity a second thought. What is it about Pete that causes you concern?

Other than patents, business successes, boxing skills & sooper high I.Q., is there anything else you would like to remain anonymous about?

lololol.

Having said that Evil took a cheap (truly heavily discounted) shot at sniffy when none was warranted IMNHSO. That's actually the kind of thing I would expect from sniffy maybe rather than evil but perhaps they have more in common than I actually previously had noticed.

Help me understand when it is that it's not warranted with snuffles.

He did not address the comment to you nor was it in any way an insult or slight to you. It was an (alleged anyway) expressed concern about anonymity. You chose to take a cheap shot. Perhaps because sniffy has done the same to you. So why are you really any different than him if that is the case.

So he shouldn't be treated the same way he treats me and others? I'll have to disagree with that. He reaps what he sows.

I didn't say that he shouldn't be treated the way he treats you and others. I did say that what you did was take a cheap shot which is what he has been known to do. how are you two really any different? Did he hurt your feelings evil? <G>