Climate Change Hoax Exposed

[psk836]

Judith Curry?!

Not even a nice try.

Curry was a very highly regarded climate scientist. Until she started questioning "the consensus".

Meh. She was a climate scientist. The problem was that she started questioning it when she started taking money from Big Oil.

She was a respected and tenured college professor when she started challenging the bogus "science" driving the global warming debate. She gave up her tenure because liberals couldn't stand that she questioned the consensus.

[evilconempire]

Judith Curry?!

Not even a nice try.

Curry was a very highly regarded climate scientist. Until she started questioning "the consensus".

Meh. She was a climate scientist. The problem was that she started questioning it when she started taking money from Big Oil.

She was a respected and tenured college professor when she started challenging the bogus "science" driving the global warming debate. She gave up her tenure because liberals couldn't stand that she questioned the consensus.

She gave up her position to focus on her private firm where she should make money off of Big Oil by carrying their water.

[psk836]

She has all the credentials you are always crowing about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Curry

Except now she is a heretic for questioning The Religion.

[evilconempire]

Credentials are good until they are bought and paid for by Big Oil.

[Scooter]

Libtardlifaggs like EConTheInbredMoron can't help but to chimp out!

[barrysoetoro]

No, but your gullibility and dishonesty has been.

I knew it, when I open this thread I bet that the second person to chime in Would be evilcockrider to throw in his two cents worth.

[barrysoetoro]

Credentials are good until they are bought and paid for by Big Oil.

There he goes. Like a good left-wing Nut Job, rips on oil companies, rips on corporations, blames the rich. Typical Democrat talking points.

[Tejanochimbo]

"Express. Home of the Daily and Sunday Express.express_logo

Climate change is ‘not as bad as we thought’ say scientists
CLIMATE change is likely to be markedly less severe than forecast, a study claimed yesterday.
By JOHN INGHAM
PUBLISHED: 10:19, Wed, Apr 25, 2018 | UPDATED: 13:50, Wed, Apr 25, 2018H


It predicted that the impact could be up to 45 per cent less intense than is widely accepted.

But the study emerged as other scientists said winter waves pounding the Scottish and Irish coasts have grown grow by up to 5ft 6in (1.7metres) over the past 70 years.

Rising sea levels and more intense storms are in line with global warming forecasts.

The study questioning the future intensity of climate change was carried out by American climatologist Judith Curry and UK mathematician Nick Lewis.

It is based on analysing the warming effect of greenhouse gases and other drivers of climate change, from the mid 19th century until 2016.

It forecast that future warming will be between 30 per cent and 45 per cent lower than suggested by simulations carried out by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel one Climate Change."
(Balance of article available on Drudge)

About time someone got the truth out so that all the bad mouths can see that we were right all along and all this "global warming" crap is just that.

► Mary, why are you into the global warming argument?

[nolaxride]

"Express. Home of the Daily and Sunday Express.express_logo

Climate change is ‘not as bad as we thought’ say scientists
CLIMATE change is likely to be markedly less severe than forecast, a study claimed yesterday.
By JOHN INGHAM
PUBLISHED: 10:19, Wed, Apr 25, 2018 | UPDATED: 13:50, Wed, Apr 25, 2018H


It predicted that the impact could be up to 45 per cent less intense than is widely accepted.

But the study emerged as other scientists said winter waves pounding the Scottish and Irish coasts have grown grow by up to 5ft 6in (1.7metres) over the past 70 years.

Rising sea levels and more intense storms are in line with global warming forecasts.

The study questioning the future intensity of climate change was carried out by American climatologist Judith Curry and UK mathematician Nick Lewis.

It is based on analysing the warming effect of greenhouse gases and other drivers of climate change, from the mid 19th century until 2016.

It forecast that future warming will be between 30 per cent and 45 per cent lower than suggested by simulations carried out by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel one Climate Change."
(Balance of article available on Drudge)

About time someone got the truth out so that all the bad mouths can see that we were right all along and all this "global warming" crap is just that.

It's great to see you're finally agreeing that climate change is ocurring, just not as fast as you thought. It's also unfortunate that you didn't post the entire article or the link. Here, I'll help.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/95074 ... -on-planet

The part you left out was very interesting.

The coastlines of Scotland and Ireland have seen the largest increases, with the average height of winter waves more than 2ft 4in (0.7metres) higher than in 1948.

And wave heights in winter storms are about 5ft 6in (1.7m) higher than 780 years ago, says the study which is to be published in the American Geophysical Union’s journal Geophysical Research Letters.

Dr Bruno Castelle of France’s National Centre for Scientific Research said: “The height of waves during winter storms is the primary factor affecting dune and cliff erosion, explaining up to 80 per cent of the shoreline variability along exposed sandy coasts."

So any increases in wave heights, and greater frequency of extreme storms, are going to have a major impact on thousands of communities along the Atlantic coastlines of Western Europe.

"This work and our other recent studies have shown both are on the rise, meaning there is a real need to ensure the Atlantic coasts of Europe are protected against present and future storm threats.”

The same scientists also showed that the winter storms of 2013-14 were the most powerful to hit the Atlantic coast of western Europe since records began in 1948.

The UK suffered its wettest ever winter during that period with widespread flooding as 12 major storms battered the country.

Curious how that disagrees with your subject line.

Thank you for your lovely attack on me in a conversation that did not include you. The material you provided is no more backed up than the material I provided. This entire subject is not "proven" science and many climate scientists disagree. However, I will make a note that you poked your nose into the debate just to attack me and provided no information that wasn't already known.

Sorry that you see it as an attack. I'm just looking for more information. And that is your subject line, no?

[nolaxride]

Judith Curry?!

Not even a nice try.

Curry was a very highly regarded climate scientist. Until she started questioning "the consensus".

And Curry never disagreed with the premise, that we're warming. She argues that it's not happening as fast as others predict it will happen.