Study: All Global Warming Accounted For In Temperature Adjustments

Are you a Gorebot? A Denier? Let's mix it up here and figure this issue out!
Post Reply
User avatar
psk836
Imperial Majesty
Posts: 6239
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:22 am
x 670

Study: All Global Warming Accounted For In Temperature Adjustments

Post by psk836 » Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:55 am

https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com ... 062717.pdf

Duh. Anybody besides the Hysterics knows global warming is the REASON the adjustments were made. It's much harder, after all, to siphon off trillions of dollars from the private sector if you don't have a good story.
1 x

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21049
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 452

Post by evilconempire » Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:02 am

0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
psk836
Imperial Majesty
Posts: 6239
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:22 am
x 670

Post by psk836 » Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:17 am

"It is not surprising that there is good agreement between NOAA,
NASA and Hadley on past temperatures given that they all largely
use the same raw data."

"Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. notes: “The differences between the three global
surface temperatures that occur are a result of the analysis
methodology as used by each of the three groups. They are not
“completely independent.” Each of the three surface temperature
analysis suffer from unresolved uncertainties and biases as we
documented…”'

"To accomplish this result, in Figure IV-2 above, it is can be seen that
the historical data changes made between May 17, 2008 and May 15,
2017 focused on reducing newly reported temperature data in the
1930s and increasing newly reported data beyond 1975. Such
changes would serve to increase the slope of the linear trend in
NASA’s GAST data over entire period.
Figure IV-3 below shows the changes made by Hadley CRU from
2001 to 2010. Here again the changes as recently as between 2001
and 2010 served to dampen the earlier cyclical pattern."

"Then, as shown in Figure IV-4, between February 2008 and May
2017, the vast bulk of the changes have served to raise
temperatures, with particular emphasis on the 1950s and 60s, as
compared to the February 2008 reported Hadley GAST data."

"As shown in Figure IV-5 below, as recently as the May 18, 2017
release, NOAA again made significant changes to their historical data
reported only two years previously in May 2015."

In Figure IV-6 below, it can be seen that NOAA’s historical data
changes made between May 17, 2008 and May 18, 2017 served to
rotate the GAST trend so as to be more steeply upward sloped. In
fact, to quote from the Climate4you author of the graph: “The
net result of the adjustments made are becoming substantial,
and adjustments since May 2006 occasionally exceeds 0.1oC.
Before 1945 global temperatures are generally changed toward
lower values, and toward higher values after 1945, resulting in a
more pronounced 20th century warming (about 0.15oC)
compared to the NCDC temperature record published in May
2008. Last diagram update: 18 May 2017.”

"Clearly the historical GAST data adjustments that have been made
have been dramatic and invariably have been favorable to Climate
Alarmists’ views regarding Global Warming. The question now is
whether the latest versions of GAST data by NOAA, NASA and
Hadley are credible for policy analysis, or even climate modeling,
purposes."

"The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data
sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of
their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical
temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and
credible U.S. and other temperature data. "
0 x

User avatar
psk836
Imperial Majesty
Posts: 6239
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 9:22 am
x 670

Post by psk836 » Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:18 am

In short:

"It is not surprising that there is good agreement between NOAA,
NASA and Hadley on past temperatures given that they all largely
use the same raw data."

"The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data
sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of
their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical
temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and
credible U.S. and other temperature data. "
0 x

Antisteroidforce
Majesty
Posts: 4021
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:48 am
x 310

Post by Antisteroidforce » Thu Jul 06, 2017 12:31 pm

Poor little snowflake crybaby crybaby sport, he still clings to it.
0 x

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest