NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
clusterchuck
Heir Apparent
Posts: 3252
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:19 pm

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by clusterchuck » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:03 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:31 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters

meanwhile every Native American in the US rolls their eyes :lo2l:
Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
I don't. And neither do you. But I understand the binary nature of the term "or"
"hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters"
"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."
"For her Native American ancestry or gender?"
"Yes"
"Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?"
"I don't. And neither do you."

Image
It's really not that deep.

You asked, "ancestry or gender", as if those were the only choices. Not everything is binary
0 x

User avatar
KC_
Royal Highness
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by KC_ » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:01 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters

meanwhile every Native American in the US rolls their eyes :lo2l:
Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
Female is not a minority. They should test her for Neanderthal dna . She probably is more of that than Indian . :lo2l:
Despite being slightly more than 50% of the population they are still considered a minority.
Well that doesn’t make any sense .
0 x
“I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees “
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33101
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by evilconempire » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm

clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:03 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:31 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters

meanwhile every Native American in the US rolls their eyes :lo2l:
Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
I don't. And neither do you. But I understand the binary nature of the term "or"
"hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters"
"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."
"For her Native American ancestry or gender?"
"Yes"
"Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?"
"I don't. And neither do you."

Image
It's really not that deep.

You asked, "ancestry or gender", as if those were the only choices. Not everything is binary
You said her ancestry was enough for them to list her as a minority law professor and then said you don't know if it is.

I introduced a second possibility in her gender, but never said the possibilities ended there. Now you're stuck on this assumption that I think it's "binary."
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33101
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by evilconempire » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm

KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:01 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters

meanwhile every Native American in the US rolls their eyes :lo2l:
Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
Female is not a minority. They should test her for Neanderthal dna . She probably is more of that than Indian . :lo2l:
Despite being slightly more than 50% of the population they are still considered a minority.
Well that doesn’t make any sense .
It does if you consider social factors. It's changing though. Give it time.
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
KC_
Royal Highness
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by KC_ » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:13 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:01 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters

meanwhile every Native American in the US rolls their eyes :lo2l:
Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
Female is not a minority. They should test her for Neanderthal dna . She probably is more of that than Indian . :lo2l:
Despite being slightly more than 50% of the population they are still considered a minority.
Well that doesn’t make any sense .
It does if you consider social factors. It's changing though. Give it time.
It ignores statistical reality, but hey if that’s the way people want to see it . :nesaitpas:
0 x
“I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees “
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33101
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by evilconempire » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:20 pm

KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:13 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:01 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm


Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
Female is not a minority. They should test her for Neanderthal dna . She probably is more of that than Indian . :lo2l:
Despite being slightly more than 50% of the population they are still considered a minority.
Well that doesn’t make any sense .
It does if you consider social factors. It's changing though. Give it time.
It ignores statistical reality, but hey if that’s the way people want to see it . :nesaitpas:
Well it is how it is right now. In '95 when she joined Harvard I do believe they were an actual minority in terms of population percentage.
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
clusterchuck
Heir Apparent
Posts: 3252
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:19 pm

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by clusterchuck » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:35 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:03 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:31 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm
Pete wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters

meanwhile every Native American in the US rolls their eyes :lo2l:
Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
I don't. And neither do you. But I understand the binary nature of the term "or"
"hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters"
"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."
"For her Native American ancestry or gender?"
"Yes"
"Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?"
"I don't. And neither do you."

Image
It's really not that deep.

You asked, "ancestry or gender", as if those were the only choices. Not everything is binary
You said her ancestry was enough for them to list her as a minority law professor and then said you don't know if it is.

I introduced a second possibility in her gender, but never said the possibilities ended there. Now you're stuck on this assumption that I think it's "binary."
No, I said the answer to your binary question is yes. Because it could be either or both depending on the situation at hand.
0 x

User avatar
KC_
Royal Highness
Posts: 1795
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:46 pm

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by KC_ » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:36 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:20 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:13 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:01 pm
KC_ wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:52 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm


Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
Female is not a minority. They should test her for Neanderthal dna . She probably is more of that than Indian . :lo2l:
Despite being slightly more than 50% of the population they are still considered a minority.
Well that doesn’t make any sense .
It does if you consider social factors. It's changing though. Give it time.
It ignores statistical reality, but hey if that’s the way people want to see it . :nesaitpas:
Well it is how it is right now. In '95 when she joined Harvard I do believe they were an actual minority in terms of population percentage.
I don’t think that’s true. Wars and females superior longevity see to that.
0 x
“I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees “
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33101
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by evilconempire » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:39 pm

clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:35 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:03 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:31 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:41 pm


Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry? It's enough for anyone. Again, it could be 1/64th, but you keep ignoring that.

I didn't realize your unproven 1/16 heritage qualified you to speak of "every Native American."
Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
I don't. And neither do you. But I understand the binary nature of the term "or"
"hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters"
"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."
"For her Native American ancestry or gender?"
"Yes"
"Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?"
"I don't. And neither do you."

Image
It's really not that deep.

You asked, "ancestry or gender", as if those were the only choices. Not everything is binary
You said her ancestry was enough for them to list her as a minority law professor and then said you don't know if it is.

I introduced a second possibility in her gender, but never said the possibilities ended there. Now you're stuck on this assumption that I think it's "binary."
No, I said the answer to your binary question is yes. Because it could be either or both depending on the situation at hand.
Then why did you say it was because of her Native American heritage?

"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."

My question introduced a second possibility in response to you saying it was her Native American heritage that was "enough."
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
clusterchuck
Heir Apparent
Posts: 3252
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:19 pm

Re: NY Times: So That Makes Warren 1/2 As Much Native American As The Average American

Post by clusterchuck » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:42 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:39 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:35 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:07 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:03 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:31 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:03 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:55 pm
clusterchuck wrote:
Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm


Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard.
For her Native American ancestry or gender?
Yes
Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?
I don't. And neither do you. But I understand the binary nature of the term "or"
"hey if 1/1000 is close enough for you that's all that matters"
"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."
"For her Native American ancestry or gender?"
"Yes"
"Gender alone was enough so how do you know her Native American ancestry was "enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard"?"
"I don't. And neither do you."

Image
It's really not that deep.

You asked, "ancestry or gender", as if those were the only choices. Not everything is binary
You said her ancestry was enough for them to list her as a minority law professor and then said you don't know if it is.

I introduced a second possibility in her gender, but never said the possibilities ended there. Now you're stuck on this assumption that I think it's "binary."
No, I said the answer to your binary question is yes. Because it could be either or both depending on the situation at hand.
Then why did you say it was because of her Native American heritage?

"Enough for what? To say you Native American ancestry?"
"Enough for the Association of American Law Schools to list Warren as a minority law professor at the University of Texas, Pennsylvania and Harvard."

My question introduced a second possibility in response to you saying it was her Native American heritage that was "enough."
I see.
0 x

Post Reply