Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
donttreadonme
God-Like
Posts: 11329
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 11:46 am

Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by donttreadonme » Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:28 pm

:lo2l:


Would It or Wouldn’t It Be Russia: Trump Goes Double Negative

WASHINGTON — It was really just a mix-up, he insisted. Like confusing “affect” and “effect,” but for unprecedented global cyberaggression.

“I thought I made myself very clear,” President Trump said, alternately riffing and note-reading on Tuesday from his chair in the White House Cabinet Room. “I came back, and I said, ‘What is going on? What’s the big deal?’”

Well.

Mr. Trump had just returned from Finland, where he sided against his own intelligence agencies’ conclusions about Russian interference in the 2016 election during a meeting with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia,” Mr. Trump had said on Monday. “I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

And by that, Mr. Trump said on Tuesday, more than 24 hours later, he meant the exact opposite. “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’” Mr. Trump said. “Sort of a double negative.”

He looked up at the cameras, then back down. “So,” he concluded, “you can put that in. And I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

It did not. And in an instant, Mr. Trump had joined the pantheon of dubious executive word-parsing and malapropisms, a bipartisan enterprise with decades of entries, if little precise precedent for Tuesday’s excuse-making.

Mr. Trump appeared confident in his powers of persuasion, repeatedly arguing that he thought he had been clear. But as he pledged support for his intelligence officials, the lights in the Cabinet Room went down, darkening his face before the cameras.

“Must be the intelligence agencies,” he said, folding his arms.

“That was strange,” he added. “But that’s O.K.”

Soon, he returned to his notes, with a message in the margin. “THERE WAS NO COLUSION” was scribbled on the page, seemingly missing an “L.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/us/p ... ussia.html
0 x
I hope they now take a look at the orange, the oranges of the investigation. The beginnings of that investigation. You look at the orange of the investigat

User avatar
barrysoetoro
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 38149
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:55 pm

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by barrysoetoro » Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:35 am

0 x
Democrats = the party of illegals over Americans, refugees over veterans, and death over life. Yet liberals think this is good for the country

User avatar
Scooter
Majesty
Posts: 5986
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 1:56 pm

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by Scooter » Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:31 am

"What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith" - Barack Hussein bin el Obama, September 2008
0 x
Image
After all the lies and trumped-up charges... *STILL* your President.

User avatar
stuporstitionist
Imperial Majesty
Posts: 6134
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Danbury Ct

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by stuporstitionist » Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:51 am

donttreadonme wrote:
Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:28 pm
:lo2l:


Would It or Wouldn’t It Be Russia: Trump Goes Double Negative

WASHINGTON — It was really just a mix-up, he insisted. Like confusing “affect” and “effect,” but for unprecedented global cyberaggression.

“I thought I made myself very clear,” President Trump said, alternately riffing and note-reading on Tuesday from his chair in the White House Cabinet Room. “I came back, and I said, ‘What is going on? What’s the big deal?’”

Well.

Mr. Trump had just returned from Finland, where he sided against his own intelligence agencies’ conclusions about Russian interference in the 2016 election during a meeting with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia,” Mr. Trump had said on Monday. “I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

And by that, Mr. Trump said on Tuesday, more than 24 hours later, he meant the exact opposite. “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’” Mr. Trump said. “Sort of a double negative.”

He looked up at the cameras, then back down. “So,” he concluded, “you can put that in. And I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

It did not. And in an instant, Mr. Trump had joined the pantheon of dubious executive word-parsing and malapropisms, a bipartisan enterprise with decades of entries, if little precise precedent for Tuesday’s excuse-making.

Mr. Trump appeared confident in his powers of persuasion, repeatedly arguing that he thought he had been clear. But as he pledged support for his intelligence officials, the lights in the Cabinet Room went down, darkening his face before the cameras.

“Must be the intelligence agencies,” he said, folding his arms.

“That was strange,” he added. “But that’s O.K.”

Soon, he returned to his notes, with a message in the margin. “THERE WAS NO COLUSION” was scribbled on the page, seemingly missing an “L.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/us/p ... ussia.html
Trump went on to clarify : "I meant to say Mexico wouldn't be paying for the wall, you wouldn't be getting great healthcare at a fraction of the cost and I wouldn't be eliminating the debt, protecting Social Security or running unarmed into a school to tackle a shooter with an AR-15."

(its a joke Mac)
1 x
Remember: the Russians believed that the best way to damage America was help elect Donald Trump.

User avatar
aluannie@q.com
Majesty
Posts: 4860
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:34 am

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by aluannie@q.com » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:08 am

stuporstitionist wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:51 am
donttreadonme wrote:
Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:28 pm
:lo2l:


Would It or Wouldn’t It Be Russia: Trump Goes Double Negative

WASHINGTON — It was really just a mix-up, he insisted. Like confusing “affect” and “effect,” but for unprecedented global cyberaggression.

“I thought I made myself very clear,” President Trump said, alternately riffing and note-reading on Tuesday from his chair in the White House Cabinet Room. “I came back, and I said, ‘What is going on? What’s the big deal?’”

Well.

Mr. Trump had just returned from Finland, where he sided against his own intelligence agencies’ conclusions about Russian interference in the 2016 election during a meeting with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia,” Mr. Trump had said on Monday. “I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

And by that, Mr. Trump said on Tuesday, more than 24 hours later, he meant the exact opposite. “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’” Mr. Trump said. “Sort of a double negative.”

He looked up at the cameras, then back down. “So,” he concluded, “you can put that in. And I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

It did not. And in an instant, Mr. Trump had joined the pantheon of dubious executive word-parsing and malapropisms, a bipartisan enterprise with decades of entries, if little precise precedent for Tuesday’s excuse-making.

Mr. Trump appeared confident in his powers of persuasion, repeatedly arguing that he thought he had been clear. But as he pledged support for his intelligence officials, the lights in the Cabinet Room went down, darkening his face before the cameras.

“Must be the intelligence agencies,” he said, folding his arms.

“That was strange,” he added. “But that’s O.K.”

Soon, he returned to his notes, with a message in the margin. “THERE WAS NO COLUSION” was scribbled on the page, seemingly missing an “L.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/us/p ... ussia.html
Trump went on to clarify : "I meant to say Mexico wouldn't be paying for the wall, you wouldn't be getting great healthcare at a fraction of the cost and I wouldn't be eliminating the debt, protecting Social Security or running unarmed into a school to tackle a shooter with an AR-15."

(its a joke Mac)
Not funny so you must be the joke but I've always known that.
0 x

User avatar
stuporstitionist
Imperial Majesty
Posts: 6134
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Danbury Ct

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by stuporstitionist » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:20 am

aluannie@q.com wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:08 am
stuporstitionist wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 7:51 am
donttreadonme wrote:
Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:28 pm
:lo2l:


Would It or Wouldn’t It Be Russia: Trump Goes Double Negative

WASHINGTON — It was really just a mix-up, he insisted. Like confusing “affect” and “effect,” but for unprecedented global cyberaggression.

“I thought I made myself very clear,” President Trump said, alternately riffing and note-reading on Tuesday from his chair in the White House Cabinet Room. “I came back, and I said, ‘What is going on? What’s the big deal?’”

Well.

Mr. Trump had just returned from Finland, where he sided against his own intelligence agencies’ conclusions about Russian interference in the 2016 election during a meeting with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. “I have President Putin; he just said it’s not Russia,” Mr. Trump had said on Monday. “I don’t see any reason why it would be.”

And by that, Mr. Trump said on Tuesday, more than 24 hours later, he meant the exact opposite. “The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,’” Mr. Trump said. “Sort of a double negative.”

He looked up at the cameras, then back down. “So,” he concluded, “you can put that in. And I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself.”

It did not. And in an instant, Mr. Trump had joined the pantheon of dubious executive word-parsing and malapropisms, a bipartisan enterprise with decades of entries, if little precise precedent for Tuesday’s excuse-making.

Mr. Trump appeared confident in his powers of persuasion, repeatedly arguing that he thought he had been clear. But as he pledged support for his intelligence officials, the lights in the Cabinet Room went down, darkening his face before the cameras.

“Must be the intelligence agencies,” he said, folding his arms.

“That was strange,” he added. “But that’s O.K.”

Soon, he returned to his notes, with a message in the margin. “THERE WAS NO COLUSION” was scribbled on the page, seemingly missing an “L.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/17/us/p ... ussia.html
Trump went on to clarify : "I meant to say Mexico wouldn't be paying for the wall, you wouldn't be getting great healthcare at a fraction of the cost and I wouldn't be eliminating the debt, protecting Social Security or running unarmed into a school to tackle a shooter with an AR-15."

(its a joke Mac)
Not funny so you must be the joke but I've always known that.
The joke is on you.
1 x
Remember: the Russians believed that the best way to damage America was help elect Donald Trump.

User avatar
Scooter
Majesty
Posts: 5986
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2018 1:56 pm

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by Scooter » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:29 pm

"What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith" - Barack Hussein bin el Obama, September 2008
0 x
Image
After all the lies and trumped-up charges... *STILL* your President.

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 38880
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by evilconempire » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:33 pm

SEN. OBAMA: What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith, and you’re absolutely right that that has not come …
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (interrupting): Your Christian faith.

SEN. OBAMA: My Christian faith — well, what I’m saying is …

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (interrupting): Connections, right.

SEN. OBAMA: … that he hasn’t suggested that I’m a Muslim, and I think that his campaign upper echelons haven’t either. What I think is fair to say is that coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I’m not what who I say I am when it comes to my faith, something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time.
0 x
It's time to impeach the criminal in the White House

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by chucky » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:39 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:33 pm
SEN. OBAMA: What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith, and you’re absolutely right that that has not come …
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (interrupting): Your Christian faith.

SEN. OBAMA: My Christian faith — well, what I’m saying is …

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (interrupting): Connections, right.

SEN. OBAMA: … that he hasn’t suggested that I’m a Muslim, and I think that his campaign upper echelons haven’t either. What I think is fair to say is that coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I’m not what who I say I am when it comes to my faith, something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time.
Now that is some seriously unbiased journalism. :lo2l:
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 38880
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: Maybe the dog ate Drumps homework too?

Post by evilconempire » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:41 pm

chucky wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:33 pm
SEN. OBAMA: What I was suggesting — you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith, and you’re absolutely right that that has not come …
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (interrupting): Your Christian faith.

SEN. OBAMA: My Christian faith — well, what I’m saying is …

MR. STEPHANOPOULOS (interrupting): Connections, right.

SEN. OBAMA: … that he hasn’t suggested that I’m a Muslim, and I think that his campaign upper echelons haven’t either. What I think is fair to say is that coming out of the Republican camp, there have been efforts to suggest that perhaps I’m not what who I say I am when it comes to my faith, something which I find deeply offensive, and that has been going on for a pretty long time.
Now that is some seriously unbiased journalism. :lo2l:
Is Stephanopoulos a journalist and since when don't interviewers correct someone when they obviously misspoke?
0 x
It's time to impeach the criminal in the White House

Post Reply