AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
barrysoetoro
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 31208
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:55 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by barrysoetoro » Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:46 pm

>> •We must ban and criminalize the possession of automatic and semi-automatic weapons!
•We must close loopholes such as buying a weapon at a gun show!
•We must ban the purchase of firearms and ammunition on the internet!
•We must increase the waiting period and make background checks more rigorous and effective!
•We must limit the number of firearms any individual can own!
•We must limit the number of bullets any firearm clip can hold!
•We must ban and criminalize the purchase and possession of armor piercing bullets, and also hollow-tip bullets!
•We must rethink the “logic” of permitting concealed weapons, especially in places like houses of worship, colleges, bars, restaurants, and political rallies!
•We must interface all data bases monitoring firearm ownership to assess the firearm-owning population more accurately and effectively!


HOW WOULD THIS APPLY TO CRUZ? WHICH OF THESE WOULD HE OBEY? HE'D JUST GET ONE OFF THE STREET!!!
0 x
☪ "May God d*mn the Saudis and America.", brookboy123 (nobrain & dope are fine with this )

User avatar
barrysoetoro
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 31208
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 7:55 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by barrysoetoro » Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:54 pm

lust4beer wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:18 am
When the world looks at the United States, it sees a land of exceptions: a time-tested if noisy democracy, a crusader in foreign policy, an exporter of beloved music and film.

But there is one quirk that consistently puzzles America’s fans and critics alike. Why, they ask, does it experience so many mass shootings?

Perhaps, some speculate, it is because American society is unusually violent. Or its racial divisions have frayed the bonds of society. Or its citizens lack proper mental care under a health care system that draws frequent derision abroad.

These explanations share one thing in common: Though seemingly sensible, all have been debunked by research on shootings elsewhere in the world. Instead, an ever-growing body of research consistently reaches the same conclusion.

he only variable that can explain the high rate of mass shootings in America is its astronomical number of guns.

A Look at the Numbers

The top-line numbers suggest a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.

Americans make up about 4.4 percent of the global population but own 42 percent of the world’s guns. From 1966 to 2012, 31 percent of the gunmen in mass shootings worldwide were American, according to a 2015 study by Adam Lankford, a professor at the University of Alabama.

Adjusted for population, only Yemen has a higher rate of mass shootings among countries with more than 10 million people — a distinction Mr. Lankford urged to avoid outliers. Yemen has the world’s second-highest rate of gun ownership after the United States.

Worldwide, Mr. Lankford found, a country’s rate of gun ownership correlated with the odds it would experience a mass shooting. This relationship held even when he excluded the United States, indicating that it could not be explained by some other factor particular to his home country. And it held when he controlled for homicide rates, suggesting that mass shootings were better explained by a society’s access to guns than by its baseline level of violence.

Factors That Don’t Correlate

If mental health made the difference, then data would show that Americans have more mental health problems than do people in other countries with fewer mass shootings. But the mental health care spending rate in the United States, the number of mental health professionals per capita and the rate of severe mental disorders are all in line with those of other wealthy countries.

A 2015 study estimated that only 4 percent of American gun deaths could be attributed to mental health issues. And Mr. Lankford, in an email, said countries with high suicide rates tended to have low rates of mass shootings — the opposite of what you would expect if mental health problems correlated with mass shootings.

Whether a population plays more or fewer video games also appears to have no impact. Americans are no more likely to play video games than people in any other developed country.

Racial diversity or other factors associated with social cohesion also show little correlation with gun deaths. Among European countries, there is little association between immigration or other diversity metrics and the rates of gun murders or mass shootings.

A Violent Country

America’s gun homicide rate was 33 per million people in 2009, far exceeding the average among developed countries. In Canada and Britain, it was 5 per million and 0.7 per million, respectively, which also corresponds with differences in gun ownership.

Americans sometimes see this as an expression of deeper problems with crime, a notion ingrained, in part, by a series of films portraying urban gang violence in the early 1990s. But the United States is not actually more prone to crime than other developed countries, according to a landmark 1999 study by Franklin E. Zimring and Gordon Hawkins of the University of California, Berkeley.

Rather, they found, in data that has since been repeatedly confirmed, that American crime is simply more lethal. A New Yorker is just as likely to be robbed as a Londoner, for instance, but the New Yorker is 54 times more likely to be killed in the process.

They concluded that the discrepancy, like so many other anomalies of American violence, came down to guns.

More gun ownership corresponds with more gun murders across virtually every axis: among developed countries, among American states, among American towns and cities and when controlling for crime rates. And gun control legislation tends to reduce gun murders, according to a recent analysis of 130 studies from 10 countries.

This suggests that the guns themselves cause the violence.
Image
0 x
☪ "May God d*mn the Saudis and America.", brookboy123 (nobrain & dope are fine with this )

User avatar
lust4beer
Majesty
Posts: 4431
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by lust4beer » Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:51 pm

barrysoetoro wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:44 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:40 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:30 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:59 am
DallasDimeBags wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:18 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:18 am
When the world looks at the United States, it sees a land of exceptions: a time-tested if noisy democracy, a crusader in foreign policy, an exporter of beloved music and film.

But there is one quirk that consistently puzzles America’s fans and critics alike. Why, they ask, does it experience so many mass shootings?

Perhaps, some speculate, it is because American society is unusually violent. Or its racial divisions have frayed the bonds of society. Or its citizens lack proper mental care under a health care system that draws frequent derision abroad.

These explanations share one thing in common: Though a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.

ed States, indicating that it could not be explained by some other factor particular to his home country. And it held when he controlled for homicide rates, suggesting that mass shootings were better explained by a society’s access to guns than by its baseline level of violence.

Factors That Don’t Correlate

If mental health made the difference, then data would show that Americans have more mental health problems than do people in other countries with fewer mass shootings. But the mental health care spending rate in the United States, the number of mental health professionals per capita and the rate of severe mental disorders are all in line with those of other wealthy countries.

A 2015 study estimated that only 4 percent of American gun deaths could be attributed to mental health issues. And Mr. Lankford, in an email, said countries with high suicide rates tended to have low rates of mass shootings — the opposite of what you would expect if mental health problems correlated with mass shootings.


They concluded that the discrepancy, like so many other anomalies of American violence, came down to guns.

More gun ownership corresponds with more gun murders across virtually every axis: among developed countries, among American states, among American towns and cities and when controlling for crime rates. And gun control legislation tends to reduce gun murders, according to a recent analysis of 130 studies from 10 countries.

This suggests that the guns themselves cause the violence.
So based on this study the solution (so to speak) would be to do what in your opinion?
Common sense gun laws is the way to go in my opinion

>> •We must ban and criminalize the possession of automatic and semi-automatic weapons!
•We must close loopholes such as buying a weapon at a gun show!
•We must ban the purchase of firearms and ammunition on the internet!
•We must increase the waiting period and make background checks more rigorous and effective!
•We must limit the number of firearms any individual can own!
•We must limit the number of bullets any firearm clip can hold!
•We must ban and criminalize the purchase and possession of armor piercing bullets, and also hollow-tip bullets!
•We must rethink the “logic” of permitting concealed weapons, especially in places like houses of worship, colleges, bars, restaurants, and political rallies!
•We must interface all data bases monitoring firearm ownership to assess the firearm-owning population more accurately and effectively!

I also believe that even our flawed “founding fathers” did not want unlimited and unrestricted rights to bear arms. Even if they did advocate for unrestricted gun ownership, these are the same men who owned slaves, committed genocide against and expelled native peoples, withheld enfranchisement from women, engaged in and killed one another in duels, and so on. Actually, I’m really surprised the National Rifle Association hasn’t advocated for the return of lethal dueling matches. Maybe that’s next on their agenda.<<

This won't happen unless congress is flipped
Do youre brains smell? They must, being their made of sh#t.

Criminals don't obey gun lawsmoron!!!
Congratulations

Benito repeating the NRA talking points l

CRIMINALS DON'T OBEY ANY LAWS

So why have any laws at all

Weak !!!!!!!
I never heard the NRA say that. That's just common sense, which you have none. Your loophole crap is DNC talking points. Just turn on MSNBC!!!

Your gun laws won't stop jack! All it does is give the gov't more power!!!!

Murder is illegal. And what did Cruz do? He disobeyed the law. Too bad he didn't go to some Kalifornia ghetto school filled with illegals and liberals.

Why are you calling me benito? I"m not for bigger gov't. YOU are.
Let's get rid of all laws that criminals don't obey

Problem solved
0 x
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson

:kneeface:

User avatar
DallasDimeBags
Majesty
Posts: 4109
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:25 am

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by DallasDimeBags » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:24 pm

lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:59 am
DallasDimeBags wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:18 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:18 am
When the world looks at the United States, it sees a land of exceptions: a time-tested if noisy democracy, a crusader in foreign policy, an exporter of beloved music and film.

But there is one quirk that consistently puzzles America’s fans and critics alike. Why, they ask, does it experience so many mass shootings?

Perhaps, some speculate, it is because American society is unusually violent. Or its racial divisions have frayed the bonds of society. Or its citizens lack proper mental care under a health care system that draws frequent derision abroad.

These explanations share one thing in common: Though a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.

ed States, indicating that it could not be explained by some other factor particular to his home country. And it held when he controlled for homicide rates, suggesting that mass shootings were better explained by a society’s access to guns than by its baseline level of violence.



Racial diversity or other factors associated with social cohesion also show little correlation with gun deaths. Among European countries, there is little association between immigration or other diversity metrics and the rates of gun murders or mass shootings.

A Violent Country

America’s gun homicide rate was 33 per million people in 2009, far exceeding the average among developed countries. In Canada and Britain, it was 5 per million and 0.7 per million, respectively, which also corresponds with differences in gun ownership.

Americans sometimes see this as an expression of deeper problems with crime, a notion ingrained, in part, by a series of films portraying urban gang violence in the early 1990s. But the United States is not actually more prone to crime than other developed countries, according to a landmark 1999 study by Franklin E. Zimring and Gordon Hawkins of the University of California, Berkeley.

Rather, they found, in data that has since been repeatedly confirmed, that American crime is simply more lethal. A New Yorker is just as likely to be robbed as a Londoner, for instance, but the New Yorker is 54 times more likely to be killed in the process.

They concluded that the discrepancy, like so many other anomalies of American violence, came down to guns.

More gun ownership corresponds with more gun murders across virtually every axis: among developed countries, among American states, among American towns and cities and when controlling for crime rates. And gun control legislation tends to reduce gun murders, according to a recent analysis of 130 studies from 10 countries.

This suggests that the guns themselves cause the violence.
So based on this study the solution (so to speak) would be to do what in your opinion?
Common sense gun laws is the way to go in my opinion

>> •We must ban and criminalize the possession of automatic and semi-automatic weapons!
•We must close loopholes such as buying a weapon at a gun show!
•We must ban the purchase of firearms and ammunition on the internet!
•We must increase the waiting period and make background checks more rigorous and effective!
•We must limit the number of firearms any individual can own!
•We must limit the number of bullets any firearm clip can hold!
•We must ban and criminalize the purchase and possession of armor piercing bullets, and also hollow-tip bullets!
•We must rethink the “logic” of permitting concealed weapons, especially in places like houses of worship, colleges, bars, restaurants, and political rallies!
•We must interface all data bases monitoring firearm ownership to assess the firearm-owning population more accurately and effectively!

I also believe that even our flawed “founding fathers” did not want unlimited and unrestricted rights to bear arms. Even if they did advocate for unrestricted gun ownership, these are the same men who owned slaves, committed genocide against and expelled native peoples, withheld enfranchisement from women, engaged in and killed one another in duels, and so on. Actually, I’m really surprised the National Rifle Association hasn’t advocated for the return of lethal dueling matches. Maybe that’s next on their agenda.<<

This won't happen unless congress is flipped
If history is any indicator It won't happen even if CONgress is flipped. They had a Democratic POTUS House and Senate during BO's first two years and didn't change anything in a way that made matters any better as far as I can see.

And I have great reservations about limiting the freedoms of people who do not commit crimes using guns because of the actions of a tiny minority who do. I also have never liked the idea that certain people feel they have a moral authority to tell other people what they do or do not need so long as those things are not being funded by my tax dollars. That being said I could at least get behind a few of those suggestions. I also would add that anyone convicted of thus sort of crime that was tried as an adult should receive the death penalty. And I can disagree with others (ones who are thoughtful and not arrogant condescending pieces of shiite) without resorting to lowest common denominator type comments like the ones by certain extremely partisan posters on this forum.
0 x

User avatar
Toshi
Imperial Majesty
Posts: 7717
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:55 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by Toshi » Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:41 am

More fucking garbage from the NY Slimes. Get a grip on reality, asshole.
0 x
"I love what happened on that ball field this week. The only problem I have with it is he didn't get more of you." - liberaljihad the föggat

User avatar
lust4beer
Majesty
Posts: 4431
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by lust4beer » Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:55 pm

lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:51 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:44 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:40 pm
barrysoetoro wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:30 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:59 am
DallasDimeBags wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:18 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:18 am
When the world looks at the United States, it sees a land of exceptions: a time-tested if noisy democracy, a crusader in foreign policy, an exporter of beloved music and film.

But there is one quirk that consistently puzzles America’s fans and critics alike. Why, they ask, does it experience so many mass shootings?

Perhaps, some speculate, it is because American society is unusually violent. Or its racial divisions have frayed the bonds of society. Or its citizens lack proper mental care under a health care system that draws frequent derision abroad.

These explanations share one thing in common: Though a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.

ed States, indicating that it could not be explained by some other factor particular to his home country. And it held when he controlled for homicide rates, suggesting that mass shootings were better explained by a society’s access to guns than by its baseline level of violence.

Factors That Don’t Correlate

If mental health made the difference, then data would show that Americans have more mental health problems than do people in other countries with fewer mass shootings. But the mental health care spending rate in the United States, the number of mental health professionals per capita and the rate of severe mental disorders are all in line with those of other wealthy countries.

A 2015 study estimated that only 4 percent of American gun deaths could be attributed to mental health issues. And Mr. Lankford, in an email, said countries with high suicide rates tended to have low rates of mass shootings — the opposite of what you would expect if mental health problems correlated with mass shootings.


They concluded that the discrepancy, like so many other anomalies of American violence, came down to guns.

More gun ownership corresponds with more gun murders across virtually every axis: among developed countries, among American states, among American towns and cities and when controlling for crime rates. And gun control legislation tends to reduce gun murders, according to a recent analysis of 130 studies from 10 countries.

This suggests that the guns themselves cause the violence.
So based on this study the solution (so to speak) would be to do what in your opinion?
Common sense gun laws is the way to go in my opinion

>> •We must ban and criminalize the possession of automatic and semi-automatic weapons!
•We must close loopholes such as buying a weapon at a gun show!
•We must ban the purchase of firearms and ammunition on the internet!
•We must increase the waiting period and make background checks more rigorous and effective!
•We must limit the number of firearms any individual can own!
•We must limit the number of bullets any firearm clip can hold!
•We must ban and criminalize the purchase and possession of armor piercing bullets, and also hollow-tip bullets!
•We must rethink the “logic” of permitting concealed weapons, especially in places like houses of worship, colleges, bars, restaurants, and political rallies!
•We must interface all data bases monitoring firearm ownership to assess the firearm-owning population more accurately and effectively!

I also believe that even our flawed “founding fathers” did not want unlimited and unrestricted rights to bear arms. Even if they did advocate for unrestricted gun ownership, these are the same men who owned slaves, committed genocide against and expelled native peoples, withheld enfranchisement from women, engaged in and killed one another in duels, and so on. Actually, I’m really surprised the National Rifle Association hasn’t advocated for the return of lethal dueling matches. Maybe that’s next on their agenda.<<

This won't happen unless congress is flipped
Do youre brains smell? They must, being their made of sh#t.

Criminals don't obey gun lawsmoron!!!
Congratulations

Benito repeating the NRA talking points l

CRIMINALS DON'T OBEY ANY LAWS

So why have any laws at all

Weak !!!!!!!
I never heard the NRA say that. That's just common sense, which you have none. Your loophole crap is DNC talking points. Just turn on MSNBC!!!

Your gun laws won't stop jack! All it does is give the gov't more power!!!!

Murder is illegal. And what did Cruz do? He disobeyed the law. Too bad he didn't go to some Kalifornia ghetto school filled with illegals and liberals.

Why are you calling me benito? I"m not for bigger gov't. YOU are.
Let's get rid of all laws that criminals don't obey

Problem solved
After they have slaughtered the innocent

Don't know about that
0 x
"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth." - Mike Tyson

:kneeface:

User avatar
JDDJR
Nobility
Posts: 1490
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:40 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by JDDJR » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:22 pm

Unlimited access to Broadband....
0 x

User avatar
thelionofthenorth
Global Moderator
Posts: 9895
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 9:14 pm

Re: AMERICAS What Explains U.S. Mass Shootings? International Comparisons Suggest an Answer

Post by thelionofthenorth » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:33 pm

chucky wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:39 am
lust4beer wrote:
Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:59 am
DallasDimeBags wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:18 pm
lust4beer wrote:
Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:18 am
When the world looks at the United States, it sees a land of exceptions: a time-tested if noisy democracy, a crusader in foreign policy, an exporter of beloved music and film.

But there is one quirk that consistently puzzles America’s fans and critics alike. Why, they ask, does it experience so many mass shootings?

Perhaps, some speculate, it is because American society is unusually violent. Or its racial divisions have frayed the bonds of society. Or its citizens lack proper mental care under a health care system that draws frequent derision abroad.

These explanations share one thing in common: Though a correlation that, on further investigation, grows only clearer.

ed States, indicating that it could not be explained by some other factor particular to his home country. And it held when he controlled for homicide rates, suggesting that mass shootings were better explained by a society’s access to guns than by its baseline level of violence.

Factors That Don’t Correlate

If mental health made the difference, then data would show that Americans have more mental health problems than do people in other countries with fewer mass shootings. But the mental health care spending rate in the United States, the number of mental health professionals per capita and the rate of severe mental disorders are all in line with those of other wealthy countries.

A 2015 study estimated that only 4 percent of American gun deaths could be attributed to mental health issues. And Mr. Lankford, in an email, said countries with high suicide rates tended to have low rates of mass shootings — the opposite of what you would expect if mental health problems correlated with mass shootings.

Whether a population plays more or fewer video games also appears to have no impact. Americans are no more likely to play video games than people in any other developed country.

Racial diversity or other factors associated with social cohesion also show little correlation with gun deaths. Among European countries, there is little association between immigration or other diversity metrics and the rates of gun murders or mass shootings.

A Violent Country

America’s gun homicide rate was 33 per million people in 2009, far exceeding the average among developed countries. In Canada and Britain, it was 5 per million and 0.7 per million, respectively, which also corresponds with differences in gun ownership.

Americans sometimes see this as an expression of deeper problems with crime, a notion ingrained, in part, by a series of films portraying urban gang violence in the early 1990s. But the United States is not actually more prone to crime than other developed countries, according to a landmark 1999 study by Franklin E. Zimring and Gordon Hawkins of the University of California, Berkeley.

Rather, they found, in data that has since been repeatedly confirmed, that American crime is simply more lethal. A New Yorker is just as likely to be robbed as a Londoner, for instance, but the New Yorker is 54 times more likely to be killed in the process.

They concluded that the discrepancy, like so many other anomalies of American violence, came down to guns.

More gun ownership corresponds with more gun murders across virtually every axis: among developed countries, among American states, among American towns and cities and when controlling for crime rates. And gun control legislation tends to reduce gun murders, according to a recent analysis of 130 studies from 10 countries.

This suggests that the guns themselves cause the violence.
So based on this study the solution (so to speak) would be to do what in your opinion?
Common sense gun laws is the way to go in my opinion

>> •We must ban and criminalize the possession of automatic and semi-automatic weapons!
•We must close loopholes such as buying a weapon at a gun show!
•We must ban the purchase of firearms and ammunition on the internet!
•We must increase the waiting period and make background checks more rigorous and effective!
•We must limit the number of firearms any individual can own!
•We must limit the number of bullets any firearm clip can hold!
•We must ban and criminalize the purchase and possession of armor piercing bullets, and also hollow-tip bullets!
•We must rethink the “logic” of permitting concealed weapons, especially in places like houses of worship, colleges, bars, restaurants, and political rallies!
•We must interface all data bases monitoring firearm ownership to assess the firearm-owning population more accurately and effectively!

I also believe that even our flawed “founding fathers” did not want unlimited and unrestricted rights to bear arms. Even if they did advocate for unrestricted gun ownership, these are the same men who owned slaves, committed genocide against and expelled native peoples, withheld enfranchisement from women, engaged in and killed one another in duels, and so on. Actually, I’m really surprised the National Rifle Association hasn’t advocated for the return of lethal dueling matches. Maybe that’s next on their agenda.<<

This won't happen unless congress is flipped
So you want to criminalize the possession of all semi-auto weapons. That would be most handguns and a majority of rifles. Do you want to apply this even to .22 caliber rifles or semi-auto hunting rifles with not removable magazine that hold only 3 or 4 rounds ?
This will not be popular in many states.
Sounds like the beginning of a negotiation.
0 x
Stupidity deserves no pity.

Post Reply