In the least shocking story of the day

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33287
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by evilconempire » Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm

chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:28 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:17 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:12 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:35 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:20 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:15 pm


What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?
Don’t know him at all so I can’t quantify it.
Typical non-answer.
I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line. Sorry if this bothers you.
You would say it's likely, eh? So either you didn't read his comments or you don't understand statistics.
You asked for odds which is very specific. I can’t read his mind nor am I familiar with him he could have been engaging in parody . So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites . As far as which exact group, it’s either heads or tails and you have to say . Call it.
Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
1 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by chucky » Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:28 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:17 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:12 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:35 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:20 pm


Don’t know him at all so I can’t quantify it.
Typical non-answer.
I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line. Sorry if this bothers you.
You would say it's likely, eh? So either you didn't read his comments or you don't understand statistics.
You asked for odds which is very specific. I can’t read his mind nor am I familiar with him he could have been engaging in parody . So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites . As far as which exact group, it’s either heads or tails and you have to say . Call it.
Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33287
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by evilconempire » Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm

chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:28 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:17 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:12 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:35 pm


Typical non-answer.
I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line. Sorry if this bothers you.
You would say it's likely, eh? So either you didn't read his comments or you don't understand statistics.
You asked for odds which is very specific. I can’t read his mind nor am I familiar with him he could have been engaging in parody . So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites . As far as which exact group, it’s either heads or tails and you have to say . Call it.
Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by chucky » Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:28 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:17 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:12 pm


I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line. Sorry if this bothers you.
You would say it's likely, eh? So either you didn't read his comments or you don't understand statistics.
You asked for odds which is very specific. I can’t read his mind nor am I familiar with him he could have been engaging in parody . So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites . As far as which exact group, it’s either heads or tails and you have to say . Call it.
Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33287
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by evilconempire » Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:37 pm

chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:28 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:17 pm


You would say it's likely, eh? So either you didn't read his comments or you don't understand statistics.
You asked for odds which is very specific. I can’t read his mind nor am I familiar with him he could have been engaging in parody . So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites . As far as which exact group, it’s either heads or tails and you have to say . Call it.
Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
So no. Got it.

"always" :lo2l:
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by chucky » Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:41 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:37 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:28 pm


You asked for odds which is very specific. I can’t read his mind nor am I familiar with him he could have been engaging in parody . So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites . As far as which exact group, it’s either heads or tails and you have to say . Call it.
Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
So no. Got it.

"always" :lo2l:
They say you don’t have to do this.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33287
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by evilconempire » Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:42 pm

chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:41 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:37 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:32 pm


Me: "What would you put the odds at of him talking about a white family?"
You: "I would say it was likely, but like I said without more information I can’t set the line."
Me: "You would say it's likely, eh?"
You: "So all I can say is that imo it is more likely he meant non whites than whites."

Image
And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
So no. Got it.

"always" :lo2l:
They say you don’t have to do this.
Do what?

"They say" :lo2l:
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by chucky » Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:47 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:42 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:41 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:37 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:14 pm


And I thought you understood nuance.
And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
So no. Got it.

"always" :lo2l:
They say you don’t have to do this.
Do what?

"They say" :lo2l:
This is the best I can do , call it.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Somebody please hep me I been hypmotized
Posts: 33287
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by evilconempire » Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:49 pm

chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:47 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:42 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:41 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:37 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm


And i thought you were literate.i
Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
So no. Got it.

"always" :lo2l:
They say you don’t have to do this.
Do what?

"They say" :lo2l:
This is the best I can do , call it.
You said that already.
0 x
How sad that your Mother didn't have an abortion before she brought such an abomination as the likes of you into this world. - Aluannie :prech:

User avatar
chucky
Ayatollah of Rock-n-Rolla
Posts: 19991
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm

Re: In the least shocking story of the day

Post by chucky » Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:14 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:49 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:47 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:42 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:41 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:37 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:37 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 6:09 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 5:04 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:57 pm
chucky wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:54 pm


Is it not obvious that I can read and write ? Again you’re thinking lacks gradation.
Of course it is. Is it not obvious that I don't mean that literally? It should be since we're posting messages on a message board. Now maybe open your mind and think about why I would say that I thought you were literate. I'm not optimistic that you're going to catch on.
I caught on a long time ago. You need to call it. I can’t call it for you. It wouldn’t be fair.
I don’t believe you. Can you prove it?
People always say the same thing.
So no. Got it.

"always" :lo2l:
They say you don’t have to do this.
Do what?

"They say" :lo2l:
This is the best I can do , call it.
You said that already.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

Post Reply