this isn't good for obama and the clintons

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

this isn't good for obama and the clintons

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 12:59 pm

https://www.investors.com/politics/edit ... oundation/

I believe that The Hill may well be on their way to a Pulitzer Prize (investigative journalism)




excerpt:


Campbell had documented a bribery/kickback scheme by Russian officials in the U.S. more than a year before Obama approved the Uranium One sale.
He also "relayed detailed information about criminal conduct throughout 2010."
Campbell was directly solicited by Russian officials to help overcome political opposition from Republicans to the Uranium One sale.
He regularly told his FBI handlers about what The Hill describes only as a "Washington entity with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton," which was paid millions to help expand Russia's U.S. uranium business and "began increasing its financial support" to the Clinton Foundation.
Russia saw the Uranium One purchase as part of a long-term strategy to dominate energy markets and make the U.S. more dependent on Russia's nuclear fuel.
Russians used "racially tinged insults to boast about how easy they found it to win uranium business under Obama."
0 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21028
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 445

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm

You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
thelionofthenorth
Global Moderator
Posts: 6987
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 9:14 pm
x 360

Post by thelionofthenorth » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:20 pm

Maybe a Hugo.
0 x
Stupidity deserves no pity.

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
0 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21028
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 445

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
0 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21028
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 445

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
0 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21028
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 445

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
0 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: donttreadonme and 3 guests