this isn't good for obama and the clintons

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21015
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 443

Re: this isn't good for obama and the clintons

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
1 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21015
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 443

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:17 pm
You're jumping the gun a little bit. They are looking to investigate now if Obama and/or Clinton were ever told about bribery and kickbacks.

Also...

"The more than 5,000 pages of documents reviewed by The Hill directly conflict with some of the Justice officials’ accounts.

For instance, both Attorney General Jeff Sessions in testimony last week and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in a letter to the Senate last month tried to suggest there was no connection between Uranium One and the nuclear bribery case. Their argument was that the criminal charges weren’t filed until 2014, while the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States' (CFIUS) approval of the Uranium One sale occurred in October 2010.

“The way I understand that matter is that the case in which Mr. Mikerin was convicted was not connected to the CFIUS problem that occurred two to three years before,” Sessions testified to the House Judiciary Committee last week, echoing Rosenstein’s letter from a few weeks earlier."

Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.

jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:16 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:11 pm



jumping the gun? I really don't think that I have.

but i have another, lib-approved-source article:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/ ... index.html

excerpt:

The informant's lawyer, Victoria Toensing, told The Hill on Wednesday that the FBI told her it is releasing her client from his nondisclosure agreement so he can discuss his work "uncovering the Russian nuclear bribery case and the efforts he witnessed by Moscow to gain influence with (former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) in hopes of winning favorable uranium decisions from the Obama administration."

will you be ok if Clinton and / or Obama is indicted and possibly convicted over this deal?

by the way, it doesn't matter what percentage of the uranium you think is usable, etc etc.
"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.

oh you don't remember you saying something about me "in the shadows" a few months ago..

that's ok. it was just me going "offline"


lol
1 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
chucky
Rock Star
Posts: 14936
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm
x 1430

Post by chucky » Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:32 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:16 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm


"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.

oh you don't remember you saying something about me "in the shadows" a few months ago..

that's ok. it was just me going "offline"


lol
Maybe he thinks you are Lamont Cranston. :lo2l:
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
I am Z
Global Moderator
Posts: 9242
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:13 am
x 1155

Post by I am Z » Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:34 pm

chucky wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:32 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:16 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm




are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.

oh you don't remember you saying something about me "in the shadows" a few months ago..

that's ok. it was just me going "offline"


lol
Maybe he thinks you are Lamont Cranston. :lo2l:
I have no idea who that is.
0 x
long before there was a president Trump, I insisted on saying Merry Christmas!

:angel11:

User avatar
Pete
Site Admin
Posts: 3837
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 1:15 am
Location: Atlanta GA USA
x 496

Post by Pete » Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:48 pm

"there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think"

truer words were never spoken :guffaw:
0 x
Nemo me impune lacessit

User avatar
chucky
Rock Star
Posts: 14936
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm
x 1430

Post by chucky » Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:50 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:34 pm
chucky wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:32 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:16 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm


there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.

oh you don't remember you saying something about me "in the shadows" a few months ago..

that's ok. it was just me going "offline"


lol
Maybe he thinks you are Lamont Cranston. :lo2l:
I have no idea who that is.
The Shadow.
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

User avatar
evilconempire
Get in my Belly!
Posts: 21015
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:25 am
x 443

Post by evilconempire » Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:52 pm

I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:16 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:15 pm


"this isn't good for obama and the clintons" when they are just not initiating investigations and testimony to find out if they even knew is definitely jumping the gun.

I'm "ok" any time someone that has done something criminal is indicted and convicted.

I didn't say how much I think is usable. I cited a well-known fact about the uranium...and yes it is relevant to this deal.


are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.

oh you don't remember you saying something about me "in the shadows" a few months ago..

that's ok. it was just me going "offline"


lol
I do remember that. It was odd for you. Did I ever question you you in it or keep track of your timing?

You’re really running this thread into the weeds. You aren’t anywhere close to your topic anymore lol
0 x
"AS MUCH AS I HATE PROVEN PEDOPHILES, I would rather have one of them than a democrat!!!" - Illeatyourdates

User avatar
chucky
Rock Star
Posts: 14936
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:27 pm
x 1430

Post by chucky » Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:55 pm

evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:52 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:16 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:46 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:39 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:31 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:06 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:51 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:42 pm
evilconempire wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:36 pm
I am Z wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:23 pm




are you sure you didn't say that?
I'm guessing now that you're spitting the proverbial hair "think"


Funny thing is, that this is actually less than 10% of our usable uranium, it's too low of a grade to be sold on the market, and it can't be exported.
It's a nothing burger in the end, but it's good that some corruption within it has been found and people convicted.
there is a big difference between citing a fact and stating what I think. It's funny how you consider that splitting hairs. I've posted this info with sources. Feel free to peruse them and get educated.

so I take it by your lack of a rebuttal that you see how you jumped the gun on how "this isn't good for obama and the clintons." :lo2l:


i..........am..........so..........sorry.


when I said "this isn't good for Obama and the Clintons"...... I really meant that it IS good.


I know how protective you are when it comes to them.

please....accept my sincerest apologies.
If Congress is investigating whether they were notified of prior to the approval and it turns out they did, how can that be good for them? Of course, saying this is good for them right now is jumping the gun also.

LOL You "know" so much that isn't so. It's funny.
lol, do you sign in and out every 2 minutes?


hahahahahaaa. I look and you're gone (again) but just about as soon as I post, you're back!


I must not forget to acknowledge your entertainment value that you add to this board!

absolutely the cheapest entertainment around.

it's too bad that you don't always understand sarcasm, though.

:eusa_dance:
I come and go from the website. Why are you looking for me? :lo2l:

Oh I got the sarcasm, but it really didn't make sense so I played the straight man to your sarcasm. I guess you didn't get it.

Either way, it looks like we are in agreement that we don't know if this will be bad or not for Obama and Clinton. Glad we could clear that up.
"coming and going" from the website doesn't log you out, Scooby.

your straight man act wasn't bad but could use some work. agree? uh huh. right.

:)2
Don't know what to tell you, bud. I logout sometimes when I leave and sometimes I just leave. I know that in both cases is doesn't show me as being here. Still not sure what this has to do with anything or why you're tracking my comings and goings. It's a little creepy really.

It was spot on. Your sarcasm needs a lot of work. It should at least make sense.

oh you don't remember you saying something about me "in the shadows" a few months ago..

that's ok. it was just me going "offline"


lol
I do remember that. It was odd for you. Did I ever question you you in it or keep track of your timing?

You’re really running this thread into the weeds. You aren’t anywhere close to your topic anymore lol
It seems to happen a lot when you are involved in the discussion. It’s good for the board in any case. :D1
0 x
"I’d rather die standing up than live on my knees."
Stephane Charbonnier

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: donttreadonme, Falstaff2, stuporstitionist and 10 guests