Niger

[Chester Cheesewright]

For those strapped securely in their assigned seats on the short bus, the topic is the administrations handling of the changing political environment in Niger. In your cult of personality world, changing the subject by injecting what you believe about Gaetz is secondary to the security of U.S. military personnel.

Since the presence of Gaetz name caused the barkers to overlook the sequence leading to "official announcement" by the administration they'll "begin planning" departure of troops, would it be leaping to conclusions the towering intellects declaring victory in this thread also didn't bother to listen to or read the account of actions by State Deprtment employees?

Are the genius responders here aware of the arrival Russian assets in Niger?
How about the de facto detention of those troops by Russia until a deal is worked out?

Doubtful.

Because gAeTz!

► Donald Trump wouldn’t stand for that

[nolaxride]

Matt will do anything to move the focus on him to something other than his underage dalliances.

When did the GOP start sanctioning pedophilia?

[clusterchuck]

Why no comments on Geatz documentation?

Pavlovian.

No comment about the actions of State Dept "officials"?
How about the letter from USAF officer?

At some point, the sleepwalking (D) party faithful will awaken to what the US "State Department" is.
Specifically
1) "Department of State" is //the system// public face of covert CIA color revolution operations.
2) What is the CIA? It's the terror arm of the /system/.

America lost another "cooperating" country because //the system(s)// strong arm tactics - historically deployed to force compliance in smaller countries - don't work anymore. It used to be they would go to countries and say "we'll deal with you if you make changes in your nation, otherwise you'll always be a poor pariah state". And if they didn't bend to the bully, a U.S. engineered color revolution followed.

But word gets around. And history repeats itself wherever CIA is focused on behalf of the the "State Department".

Now these countries say "f0ck you". Why do they say that? The rise of BRICS.

//the system// tells El Salvador they have to worry about the "human rights" of criminals. But China endorses El Salvador throwing anyone with a face tattoo in jail, and builds them a national library.

//the system// tells East Africa they have to tolerate LGBTQXYZ garbage. But China builds East Africa a highway, which they've never had before.

//the system// tells Niger they have to have //their democracy//. China tells them they can do what they want.

//They// can't compete if all they're going to offer is //their democracy// and gay porn.

[MiltantCentrist]

TLDR and your "source" is compromised.

I hope this helps.

[Evil]

Rapey McForehead makes lots of claims, but provides morning to support them. Qluckster eats it up without question.

Biden announces the removal of the troops and they still complain.

[nolaxride]

Why no comments on Geatz documentation?

Pavlovian.

No comment about the actions of State Dept "officials"?
How about the letter from USAF officer?

At some point, the sleepwalking (D) party faithful will awaken to what the US "State Department" is.
Specifically
1) "Department of State" is //the system// public face of covert CIA color revolution operations.
2) What is the CIA? It's the terror arm of the /system/.

America lost another "cooperating" country because //the system(s)// strong arm tactics - historically deployed to force compliance in smaller countries - don't work anymore. It used to be they would go to countries and say "we'll deal with you if you make changes in your nation, otherwise you'll always be a poor pariah state". And if they didn't bend to the bully, a U.S. engineered color revolution followed.

But word gets around. And history repeats itself wherever CIA is focused on behalf of the the "State Department".

Now these countries say "f0ck you". Why do they say that? The rise of BRICS.

//the system// tells El Salvador they have to worry about the "human rights" of criminals. But China endorses El Salvador throwing anyone with a face tattoo in jail, and builds them a national library.

//the system// tells East Africa they have to tolerate LGBTQXYZ garbage. But China builds East Africa a highway, which they've never had before.

//the system// tells Niger they have to have //their democracy//. China tells them they can do what they want.

//They// can't compete if all they're going to offer is //their democracy// and gay porn.

Yes. I don't believe him. Gaetz is not credible.

[clusterchuck]

U.S. to Withdraw Troops From Chad, Dealing Another Blow to Africa Policy
The departure of U.S. military personnel in Chad and Niger comes as both countries are turning away from years of cooperation with the United States and forming partnerships with Russia.

By Eric Schmitt
Reporting from Washington April 25, 2024

The Pentagon will withdraw dozens of Special Operations forces from Chad in the next few days, the second major blow in a week to American security and counterterrorism policy in a volatile swath of West and Central Africa, U.S. officials said on Thursday.

The decision to pull out about 75 Army Special Forces personnel working in Ndjamena, Chad’s capital, comes days after the Biden administration said it would withdraw more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel from Niger in the coming months.

The Pentagon is being forced to draw down troops in response to the African governments’ demands to renegotiate the rules and conditions under which U.S. military personnel can operate. Both countries want terms that better favor their interests, analysts say. The decision to withdraw from Niger is final, but U.S. officials said they hoped to resume talks on security cooperation after elections in Chad on May 6.

The departure of U.S. military advisers in both countries comes as Niger, as well as Mali and Burkina Faso, is turning away from years of cooperation with the United States and forming partnerships with Russia — or at least exploring closer security ties with Moscow.

The Kremlin uses persuasion — and other times, coercion — to achieve its aims. The United States warned Chad’s president last year that Russian mercenaries were plotting to kill him and three senior aides and that Moscow was backing Chadian rebels massing in the Central African Republic, to the south. At the same time, the Kremlin was courting sympathizers within Chad’s ruling elite, including cabinet ministers and a half brother of the president.

The impending departure of the U.S. military advisers from Chad, a sprawling desert nation at the crossroads of the continent, was prompted by a letter from the Chadian government this month that the United States saw as threatening to end an important security agreement with Washington.
The letter was sent to the American defense attaché and did not directly order the U.S. military to leave Chad, but it did single out a Special Operations task force that operates from a Chadian military base in the capital and serves as an important hub for coordinating U.S. military training and advising missions in the region.

About 75 Green Berets from the 20th Special Forces Group, a National Guard unit from Alabama, serve in the task force. A handful of other U.S. military personnel work in the embassy or in different advisory jobs and are not affected by the decision to withdraw, officials said.
The letter blindsided and puzzled American diplomats and military officers. It was sent from Chad’s chief of air staff, Idriss Amine; typed in French, one of Chad’s official languages; and written on General Amine’s official letterhead, two American officials said. It was not sent through official diplomatic channels, they said, which would be the typical method of handling such issues.

Current and former U.S. officials said the letter, which was reported earlier by CNN, could be a negotiating tactic by some members of the military and the government to pressure Washington into a more favorable deal before the elections in May.

American officials said that unlike the U.S. troop departure from Niger, the withdrawal from Chad could be only temporary while diplomats determined whether a new so-called status of forces agreement could be reached, and if so, whether U.S. military advisers would return to Chad. Barring last-minute diplomatic developments, the U.S. troops are scheduled to begin leaving this weekend and complete their departure to Germany by May 1, two American officials said.

“As talks continue with Chadian officials, U.S. Africa Command is currently planning to reposition some U.S. military forces from Chad, a portion of which was already scheduled to depart,” Maj. Pete Nguyen, a Pentagon spokesman, said on Thursday.

“This temporary step is part of an ongoing review of our security cooperation, which will resume after the May 6 presidential election,” Major Nguyen said.

While France, a former colonial power in the region, has a much larger military presence in Chad, the United States has also relied on the country as a trusted security partner.

Chad’s presidential guard is one of the best trained and equipped in the semiarid belt of Africa known as the Sahel. The country has played host to military exercises conducted by the United States. Officials at the Pentagon’s Africa Command say Chad has been a major partner in an effort involving several countries in the Lake Chad basin to fight Boko Haram.

“U.S. Africa Command remains dedicated to building enduring partnerships with Chad and other African nations in the Sahel to address mutual security concerns and to help promote a peaceful and prosperous future in the region,” Gen. Michael E. Langley, the head of the command, said during a visit to Chad in January, according to a statement from the command.

During the trip, the statement said, General Langley met with Gen. Abakar Abdelkerim Daoud, Chad’s military chief of staff, and other leaders. Discussions focused on regional security challenges and Chadian efforts to counter violent extremism in the Sahel.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/25/us/p ... rawal.html