Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Political debate. Welcome Yahoo Message Board exiles and everybody else !!
Post Reply
User avatar
illeatyourdates2
Underboss
Posts: 42121
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 3:16 pm

Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by illeatyourdates2 » Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:21 pm

Social Media Censorship Is Scary
Christina Herrin

Posted: Aug 01, 2020 12:01 AM

One of the many great things about being an American is that we have the right to freedom of speech. I may not agree with what my neighbor has to say, but I will fight to the death for his or her ability to say it. This concept was a founding principle that is now in jeopardy because of the monopoly power wielded by social media giants.

An example of this disturbing trend occurred this week when a video from several frontline doctors who questioned the status quo position on COVID-19 treatments and protocols was summarily scrubbed from most top internet and social media sites.

After going “viral,” the video was immediately taken down by Twitter, YouTube, and several other prominent platforms. Unfortunately, many Americans missed the opportunity to watch the video before it was removed.

The reason for removal stems from the concern that the content contained in the video was misinformation about hydroxychloroquine (an extremely politicized drug used to treat COVID-19) and other information about the virus.

It would have been great to have been able to discuss the content of the video within this opinion editorial, but unfortunately, the video was censored by Big Tech so rapidly that even I have not been able to watch the entire video.

With that being said, this type of “cancel culture” creates an environment where people are mostly exposed only to their small polarized echo chambers. They are less likely to encounter alternative views and information, which exacerbates division.

Coronavirus, like many issues in America, has been politicized to a point where medical professionals are shut out of the discussion if they don’t agree with the status quo. Isn’t the media supposed to present all angles and give credence to experts who have alternative opinions?

The idea that simply disagreeing with the masses or dissenting from government mantras results in such backlash is disturbing in the least.

Perhaps John Stuart Mill said it best, “The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”

The main issue with censoring information and alternative opinions is that it reduces the ability of one to critically think and analyze facts. The information in the video could have been a complete hogwash. Or of a riveting new discovery, or a mixture of both. Unfortunately, millions of Americans will likely never know what the doctors said in the video.

In America, we treasure the idea of a robust public discourse. In many ways, Americans engaging in debate is how we have made major progress. Questioning the status quo can lead to very good outcomes and should be welcomed, not banned. Imagine if abolitionists or women’s rights advocates were banned from stating their opinion because those in charge simply disagreed with their positions.

The behavior by social media companies and other tech giants to quell certain opinions and information does no good, except to keep those in power in the driver’s seat.

https://townhall.com/columnists/christi ... p=20427508

:angel:
0 x

User avatar
liberaljihad
Friend of Ours
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:41 am

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by liberaljihad » Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:25 pm

illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:21 pm
Social Media Censorship Is Scary
Christina Herrin

Posted: Aug 01, 2020 12:01 AM

One of the many great things about being an American is that we have the right to freedom of speech. I may not agree with what my neighbor has to say, but I will fight to the death for his or her ability to say it. This concept was a founding principle that is now in jeopardy because of the monopoly power wielded by social media giants.

An example of this disturbing trend occurred this week when a video from several frontline doctors who questioned the status quo position on COVID-19 treatments and protocols was summarily scrubbed from most top internet and social media sites.

After going “viral,” the video was immediately taken down by Twitter, YouTube, and several other prominent platforms. Unfortunately, many Americans missed the opportunity to watch the video before it was removed.

The reason for removal stems from the concern that the content contained in the video was misinformation about hydroxychloroquine (an extremely politicized drug used to treat COVID-19) and other information about the virus.

It would have been great to have been able to discuss the content of the video within this opinion editorial, but unfortunately, the video was censored by Big Tech so rapidly that even I have not been able to watch the entire video.

With that being said, this type of “cancel culture” creates an environment where people are mostly exposed only to their small polarized echo chambers. They are less likely to encounter alternative views and information, which exacerbates division.

Coronavirus, like many issues in America, has been politicized to a point where medical professionals are shut out of the discussion if they don’t agree with the status quo. Isn’t the media supposed to present all angles and give credence to experts who have alternative opinions?

The idea that simply disagreeing with the masses or dissenting from government mantras results in such backlash is disturbing in the least.

Perhaps John Stuart Mill said it best, “The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”

The main issue with censoring information and alternative opinions is that it reduces the ability of one to critically think and analyze facts. The information in the video could have been a complete hogwash. Or of a riveting new discovery, or a mixture of both. Unfortunately, millions of Americans will likely never know what the doctors said in the video.

In America, we treasure the idea of a robust public discourse. In many ways, Americans engaging in debate is how we have made major progress. Questioning the status quo can lead to very good outcomes and should be welcomed, not banned. Imagine if abolitionists or women’s rights advocates were banned from stating their opinion because those in charge simply disagreed with their positions.

The behavior by social media companies and other tech giants to quell certain opinions and information does no good, except to keep those in power in the driver’s seat.

https://townhall.com/columnists/christi ... p=20427508

:angel:
So then I can assume you oppose the president's threat to shut down Tic Toc, a social media platform?
0 x
But you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears
Take the rag away from your face
Now ain’t the time for your tears

User avatar
illeatyourdates2
Underboss
Posts: 42121
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 3:16 pm

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by illeatyourdates2 » Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:22 pm

liberaljihad wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:25 pm
illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:21 pm
Social Media Censorship Is Scary
Christina Herrin

Posted: Aug 01, 2020 12:01 AM

One of the many great things about being an American is that we have the right to freedom of speech. I may not agree with what my neighbor has to say, but I will fight to the death for his or her ability to say it. This concept was a founding principle that is now in jeopardy because of the monopoly power wielded by social media giants.

An example of this disturbing trend occurred this week when a video from several frontline doctors who questioned the status quo position on COVID-19 treatments and protocols was summarily scrubbed from most top internet and social media sites.

After going “viral,” the video was immediately taken down by Twitter, YouTube, and several other prominent platforms. Unfortunately, many Americans missed the opportunity to watch the video before it was removed.

The reason for removal stems from the concern that the content contained in the video was misinformation about hydroxychloroquine (an extremely politicized drug used to treat COVID-19) and other information about the virus.

It would have been great to have been able to discuss the content of the video within this opinion editorial, but unfortunately, the video was censored by Big Tech so rapidly that even I have not been able to watch the entire video.

With that being said, this type of “cancel culture” creates an environment where people are mostly exposed only to their small polarized echo chambers. They are less likely to encounter alternative views and information, which exacerbates division.

Coronavirus, like many issues in America, has been politicized to a point where medical professionals are shut out of the discussion if they don’t agree with the status quo. Isn’t the media supposed to present all angles and give credence to experts who have alternative opinions?

The idea that simply disagreeing with the masses or dissenting from government mantras results in such backlash is disturbing in the least.

Perhaps John Stuart Mill said it best, “The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”

The main issue with censoring information and alternative opinions is that it reduces the ability of one to critically think and analyze facts. The information in the video could have been a complete hogwash. Or of a riveting new discovery, or a mixture of both. Unfortunately, millions of Americans will likely never know what the doctors said in the video.

In America, we treasure the idea of a robust public discourse. In many ways, Americans engaging in debate is how we have made major progress. Questioning the status quo can lead to very good outcomes and should be welcomed, not banned. Imagine if abolitionists or women’s rights advocates were banned from stating their opinion because those in charge simply disagreed with their positions.

The behavior by social media companies and other tech giants to quell certain opinions and information does no good, except to keep those in power in the driver’s seat.

https://townhall.com/columnists/christi ... p=20427508

:angel:
So then I can assume you oppose the president's threat to shut down Tic Toc, a social media platform?
YES!! Because tik tok is OWNED by you libturd democrats MASTER China!!

:angel:
0 x

User avatar
stuporstitionist
Soldier
Posts: 8697
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Ct

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by stuporstitionist » Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:19 pm

illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:22 pm
liberaljihad wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:25 pm
illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:21 pm
Social Media Censorship Is Scary
Christina Herrin

Posted: Aug 01, 2020 12:01 AM

One of the many great things about being an American is that we have the right to freedom of speech. I may not agree with what my neighbor has to say, but I will fight to the death for his or her ability to say it. This concept was a founding principle that is now in jeopardy because of the monopoly power wielded by social media giants.

An example of this disturbing trend occurred this week when a video from several frontline doctors who questioned the status quo position on COVID-19 treatments and protocols was summarily scrubbed from most top internet and social media sites.

After going “viral,” the video was immediately taken down by Twitter, YouTube, and several other prominent platforms. Unfortunately, many Americans missed the opportunity to watch the video before it was removed.

The reason for removal stems from the concern that the content contained in the video was misinformation about hydroxychloroquine (an extremely politicized drug used to treat COVID-19) and other information about the virus.

It would have been great to have been able to discuss the content of the video within this opinion editorial, but unfortunately, the video was censored by Big Tech so rapidly that even I have not been able to watch the entire video.

With that being said, this type of “cancel culture” creates an environment where people are mostly exposed only to their small polarized echo chambers. They are less likely to encounter alternative views and information, which exacerbates division.

Coronavirus, like many issues in America, has been politicized to a point where medical professionals are shut out of the discussion if they don’t agree with the status quo. Isn’t the media supposed to present all angles and give credence to experts who have alternative opinions?

The idea that simply disagreeing with the masses or dissenting from government mantras results in such backlash is disturbing in the least.

Perhaps John Stuart Mill said it best, “The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”

The main issue with censoring information and alternative opinions is that it reduces the ability of one to critically think and analyze facts. The information in the video could have been a complete hogwash. Or of a riveting new discovery, or a mixture of both. Unfortunately, millions of Americans will likely never know what the doctors said in the video.

In America, we treasure the idea of a robust public discourse. In many ways, Americans engaging in debate is how we have made major progress. Questioning the status quo can lead to very good outcomes and should be welcomed, not banned. Imagine if abolitionists or women’s rights advocates were banned from stating their opinion because those in charge simply disagreed with their positions.

The behavior by social media companies and other tech giants to quell certain opinions and information does no good, except to keep those in power in the driver’s seat.

https://townhall.com/columnists/christi ... p=20427508

:angel:
So then I can assume you oppose the president's threat to shut down Tic Toc, a social media platform?
YES!! Because tik tok is OWNED by you libturd democrats MASTER China!!

:angel:
Free speech is only for people we like. :winky:
0 x
Remember: the Russians believed that the best way to damage America was help elect Donald Trump.

User avatar
stuporstitionist
Soldier
Posts: 8697
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Ct

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by stuporstitionist » Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:24 pm

I just need them to list the controversial opinions that they feel they're not allowed to say because I hear more xxxx now than I ever have in my life.
0 x
Remember: the Russians believed that the best way to damage America was help elect Donald Trump.

User avatar
illeatyourdates2
Underboss
Posts: 42121
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 3:16 pm

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by illeatyourdates2 » Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:50 pm

stuporstitionist wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:24 pm
I just need them to list the controversial opinions that they feel they're not allowed to say because I hear more xxxx now than I ever have in my life.
libturd democrats can post ANYTHING THEY WANT TO the libturd democrat owned social media, but they block over 75% of Republican posts regardless of what they say!!

:angel:
0 x

User avatar
liberaljihad
Friend of Ours
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:41 am

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by liberaljihad » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:24 pm

illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 3:22 pm
liberaljihad wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:25 pm
illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:21 pm
Social Media Censorship Is Scary
Christina Herrin

Posted: Aug 01, 2020 12:01 AM

One of the many great things about being an American is that we have the right to freedom of speech. I may not agree with what my neighbor has to say, but I will fight to the death for his or her ability to say it. This concept was a founding principle that is now in jeopardy because of the monopoly power wielded by social media giants.

An example of this disturbing trend occurred this week when a video from several frontline doctors who questioned the status quo position on COVID-19 treatments and protocols was summarily scrubbed from most top internet and social media sites.

After going “viral,” the video was immediately taken down by Twitter, YouTube, and several other prominent platforms. Unfortunately, many Americans missed the opportunity to watch the video before it was removed.

The reason for removal stems from the concern that the content contained in the video was misinformation about hydroxychloroquine (an extremely politicized drug used to treat COVID-19) and other information about the virus.

It would have been great to have been able to discuss the content of the video within this opinion editorial, but unfortunately, the video was censored by Big Tech so rapidly that even I have not been able to watch the entire video.

With that being said, this type of “cancel culture” creates an environment where people are mostly exposed only to their small polarized echo chambers. They are less likely to encounter alternative views and information, which exacerbates division.

Coronavirus, like many issues in America, has been politicized to a point where medical professionals are shut out of the discussion if they don’t agree with the status quo. Isn’t the media supposed to present all angles and give credence to experts who have alternative opinions?

The idea that simply disagreeing with the masses or dissenting from government mantras results in such backlash is disturbing in the least.

Perhaps John Stuart Mill said it best, “The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”

The main issue with censoring information and alternative opinions is that it reduces the ability of one to critically think and analyze facts. The information in the video could have been a complete hogwash. Or of a riveting new discovery, or a mixture of both. Unfortunately, millions of Americans will likely never know what the doctors said in the video.

In America, we treasure the idea of a robust public discourse. In many ways, Americans engaging in debate is how we have made major progress. Questioning the status quo can lead to very good outcomes and should be welcomed, not banned. Imagine if abolitionists or women’s rights advocates were banned from stating their opinion because those in charge simply disagreed with their positions.

The behavior by social media companies and other tech giants to quell certain opinions and information does no good, except to keep those in power in the driver’s seat.

https://townhall.com/columnists/christi ... p=20427508

:angel:
So then I can assume you oppose the president's threat to shut down Tic Toc, a social media platform?
YES!! Because tik tok is OWNED by you libturd democrats MASTER China!!

:angel:
Yes you oppose Trump, or yes Tic Toc should be censored?
0 x
But you who philosophize disgrace and criticize all fears
Take the rag away from your face
Now ain’t the time for your tears

User avatar
stuporstitionist
Soldier
Posts: 8697
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Ct

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by stuporstitionist » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:23 pm

illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:50 pm
stuporstitionist wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:24 pm
I just need them to list the controversial opinions that they feel they're not allowed to say because I hear more xxxx now than I ever have in my life.
libturd democrats can post ANYTHING THEY WANT TO the libturd democrat owned social media, but they block over 75% of Republican posts regardless of what they say!!

:angel:
Only 75%? Let me notify my NWO Illuminati Jewish conspiracy overlords immediately to tell them 25% of Repub posts are still getting through.

Should I call Soros, Hillary, or Biden first?
0 x
Remember: the Russians believed that the best way to damage America was help elect Donald Trump.

User avatar
thelionofthenorth
Global Moderator
Posts: 14593
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 9:14 pm

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by thelionofthenorth » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:25 pm

stuporstitionist wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:23 pm
illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:50 pm
stuporstitionist wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:24 pm
I just need them to list the controversial opinions that they feel they're not allowed to say because I hear more xxxx now than I ever have in my life.
libturd democrats can post ANYTHING THEY WANT TO the libturd democrat owned social media, but they block over 75% of Republican posts regardless of what they say!!

:angel:
Only 75%? Let me notify my NWO Illuminati Jewish conspiracy overlords immediately to tell them 25% of Repub posts are still getting through.

Should I call Soros, Hillary, or Biden first?
Go right to the top: Blofeldt. 🙄
0 x
pietatem non pertinet stultitia

User avatar
illeatyourdates2
Underboss
Posts: 42121
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 3:16 pm

Re: Social Media Censorship Is Scary

Post by illeatyourdates2 » Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:03 am

stuporstitionist wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:23 pm
illeatyourdates2 wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:50 pm
stuporstitionist wrote:
Sat Aug 01, 2020 4:24 pm
I just need them to list the controversial opinions that they feel they're not allowed to say because I hear more xxxx now than I ever have in my life.
libturd democrats can post ANYTHING THEY WANT TO the libturd democrat owned social media, but they block over 75% of Republican posts regardless of what they say!!

:angel:
Only 75%? Let me notify my NWO Illuminati Jewish conspiracy overlords immediately to tell them 25% of Repub posts are still getting through.

Should I call Soros, Hillary, or Biden first?
They still control you mentally ill woke libturd democrats!!

:angel:
0 x

Post Reply